Acta Scientific Nutritional Health (ASNH)(ISSN: 2582-1423)

Research Article Volume 10 Issue 4

Comparison JONES-DSD and [a,b] Analysis at the Real Design Stage for Optimizing

1 Team Shizuoka for Optimizing, Shizuoka, Japan
2 Team Shizuoka for Optimizing, Miyagi, Japan
3 Team Shizuoka for Optimizing, Iwata, Japan.
4 Team Shizuoka for Optimizing, Numazu, Japan
5 Saitama Forum, Japan

1PG Scholar (3rd Year), Department of Rog Nidan Evum Vikruti Vigyan, Chaudhary Brahm Prakash Ayurved Charak Sansthan, Khera Dabar, New Delhi – 110073, India

2Professor, HOD, Department of Rog Nidan Evum Vikruti Vigyan, Chaudhary Brahm Prakash Ayurved Charak Sansthan, Khera Dabar, New Delhi – 110073, India

3Department of Rog Nidan Evum Vikruti Vigyan, Chaudhary Brahm Prakash Ayurved Charak Sansthan, Khera Dabar, New Delhi – 110073, India

*Corresponding Author: Teruo Mori, Team Shizuoka for Optimizing, Shizuoka, Japan.

Received: February 23, 2026; Published: March 22, 2026

Abstract

JONES:DSD1) (C+, C-, C0) designs are known to prevent two-factor product terms and squared terms from confounding linear terms. However, the number of experiments required is roughly twice that of the conference (C) matrices alone. Therefore, when comparing the DSD design with the C matrices and [a,b] analysis2) using the same layout (Power supply3) circuit: 3 levels, 6 factors), the number of experiments was roughly the same. The response (output voltage: larger is better) characteristics were 21.11 and 31.69, respectively, and the latter (C matrices and [a, b] analysis) was superior, so we report this. Furthermore, the level combination response for the maximum factor effect of DSD was below the maximum value of the DSD response.

Keywords: Conference Matrices; DSD; Optimizing; [a,b] Analysis; Orthgonality

References

    1. Bradley Jones and Christopher J Nachtsheim. “A Class of Three-Level Designs for Definitive Screening in the Presence of Second-Order Effects”. Journal of Quality Technology1 (2011).
    2. Part 2: C matrix and [a,b] analysis. Teruo Mori “Conference matrices for optimizing and applications”. Spring Nature (2024): 95-171.
    3. Kazuo Tatebayashi (2004): Nikka-Giren (Japan).

    Citation

    Citation: Teruo Mori., et al. “Comparison JONES-DSD and [a,b] Analysis at the Real Design Stage for Optimizing". Acta Scientific Nutritional Health 10.4 (2026): 04-11.

    Copyright

    Copyright: © 2026 Teruo Mori., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.




Metrics

Acceptance rate30%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days
Impact Factor1.316

Indexed In





News and Events


  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be provided with the Publication Certificate after their successful publication
  • Last Date for submission
    Authors are requested to submit manuscripts on/before April 13, 2026, for the upcoming issue of 2026.

Contact US