Reviewer Guidelines

Reviewer Guidelines

Acta Scientific has laid down the following guidelines for reviewers for the good outcome of the content. Articles submitted to Acta Scientific are subjected to double blinded peer review process in which both the reviewer and the author remain anonymous to each other. Acta Scientifica believes that, thorough peer review process is a critical factor to yield immense quality literature to be published in the journal.

Criteria to be considered by peer reviewers in the course of manuscript evaluation

Peer reviewers are requested to check for the following requirements for enhancing the manuscript quality.
The study should possess novelty and should present the results of original research. It is required that the reported results are not published elsewhere.
The manuscript has to meet the publication standards.
The study subject should be advanced over formerly published work.
Possible significance of the work with regard to the present and hereafter.

Reviewer’s assignments during peer review

1. Present your perspective regarding quality of the article and provide the area of the article to be upgraded.
2. Outline the strengths and weaknesses of the manuscript.
3. Put forth your valuable suggestions to the author on how to improve the article.
4. If the article is worthy of rejection in your horizon, please explain the grounds on which the conclusion is posed.
5. Reviewers are requested to avoid any personalised statements that may be considered as biased.
6. The reviewers need to maintain confidentiality throughout the peer review process.
7. Reviewers are not allowed to make use of any confidential information from the paper prior to publication.
8. Even after publication, reviewers are allowed to use only the published data but not the content that they have gained from previous drafts during peer review process.

Information apart from the published content can be used only after acquiring permission from the author.

Reviewers are requested to perform the peer review with ensured uniformity and impartiality.
We request reviewers to complete the peer review analysis within the stipulated time period.

Acta Scientific trusts the genuine peer review process that the reviewers carry out so that it helps us to publish the content with good essence.


Editor-in-Chief's List

Manas Mohan Adhikary
  • Editor Profile
  • Feed Back
 Manjubala Dash
  • Editor Profile
  • Feed Back
Dibyajyoti Banerjee
  • Editor Profile
  • Feed Back
Spiros Paramithiotis
  • Editor Profile
  • Feed Back
Georges
  • Editor Profile
  • Feed Back
Tammi McGill-Carter
  • Editor Profile
  • Feed Back

News and Events


  • Special Issue on Reviews
    Acta Scientific Journals has been started Special Issue on Reviews, researchers from world wide welcoming for submission of their reviews on any topic by on/ before September 15, 2019. Special Issue is going to be released on October 01, 2019
  • Submission Timeline for Regular Issue
    Last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is September 30, 2019.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of “Best Article of the Issue”.
  • Welcoming Article Submission
    Acta Scientific delightfully welcomes active researchers for submission of articles towards the upcoming issue of respective journals.



  • Member In






    Contact Us







    ff

    © 2019 Acta Scientific, All rights reserved.