Acta Scientific Veterinary Sciences (ISSN: 2582-3183)

Research Article Volume 7 Issue 11

Private Versus Professional: Offspring Sex, Litter Composition and Neonate Mortality in Two Gazelle Husbandry Regimes

Adil Uztemur1, Kadir Onk2 and Torsten Wronski3*

1Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, General Directorate of Nature Conservation and National Parks, Şanlıurfa, Republic of Türkiye
2The University of Kafkas, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Animal Science, Kars, Republic of Türkiye
3School of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK

*Corresponding Author: Torsten Wronski, School of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.

Received: November 05, 2025; Published: December 30, 2025

Abstract

The rapid loss of biodiversity has increased reliance on captive breeding and reintroduction programs to conserve endangered species, yet these efforts face obstacles such as limited veterinary care, inbreeding, skewed sex ratios, and high juvenile mortality. This study examines breeding success and neonate survival in Arabian sand gazelles (Gazella marica) from private collections in Şanlıurfa Province, Turkey, and compares them with data from the King Khalid Wildlife Research Centre (KKWRC) in Saudi Arabia. We assessed offspring sex ratio, litter type, and survival during the first 30 days of life. Private collections showed a much higher frequency of singleton births—especially in first-time mothers—compared with KKWRC herds. Births in private facilities were concentrated between April and July, whereas KKWRC gazelles reproduced over a longer season. Although sex ratios were generally balanced, neonate survival in private collections was markedly lower. This reduced survival likely reflects management issues, including limited veterinary support and maternal inexperience. Overall, the study demonstrates how captive management conditions influence breeding outcomes and early survival in endangered species and emphasizes the need for stronger husbandry practices and reliable veterinary care in private breeding programs.

Keywords: Conservation Breeding; Private Collections; Offspring Life History Traits; Desert Ungulates; Middle East

References

  1. Mallon DP., et al. “Regional Status of Antelopes in North Africa, the Middle East and Asia, and Identification of Conservation Priorities”. In: Mallon DP. and Kingswood SC. (eds.) Antelopes - Global Survey and Regional Action Plans, Part 4. SSC Antelope Specialist Group, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland (2001): 231-244.
  2. Miranda R., et al. “The role of zoos and aquariums in a changing world”. Annual Review of Animal Biosciences 11 (2023): 287-306.
  3. Leus K. “Captive Breeding and Conservation”. Biodiversity Conservation in the Arabian Peninsula. Zoology in the Middle East 3 (2011): 151-158.
  4. Steventon C., et al. “Management lessons from a long-term captive-breeding program”. Conservation Science and Practice 6 (2024): e13215.
  5. Moloney DJF., et al. “The Conservationist's Toolkit: A critical review of the need for ex situ conservation and the role of captive breeding”. Biological Conservation 279 (2023): e109913.
  6. McGowan PJK., et al. “IUCN Guidelines for Determining When and How Ex Situ Management Should Be Used in Species Conservation”. Conservation Letters 10 (2016): 361-366.
  7. Baskin L. and Danell K. “Ecology of ungulates - A handbook of species in Eastern Europe and northern and central Asia”. Springer, Berlin (2003): 434.
  8. IUCN SSC Antelope Specialist Group. “Gazella marica”. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2017 (2017b): e.T8977A50187738.
  9. IUCN SSC Antelope Specialist Group. “Gazella subgutturosa”. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2017 (2017a): e.T8976A50187422.
  10. Martin RA., et al. “Reproductive biology of Gazella arabica: Predictors of offspring weight and short‑ and long-term offspring survival”. Current Zoology 69 (2022): 643-653.
  11. Domínguez S., et al. “Genetic analysis of juvenile survival in the captive population of Mhorr gazelle (Nanger dama mhorr) and the effect of inbreeding”. Conservation Genetics 26 (2025): 999-1010.
  12. Kichenside TB and Lindsay NB. “The Husbandry of Gazelles at King Khalid Wildlife Research Centre”. In: Habibi K., et al. (eds.) The Gazelles of Arabia. National Commission for Wildlife Conservation and Development, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (1997): 219-230.
  13. Sludsky AA. “Breeding of Gazelle”. Trudy Instituta Zoologii Akademii Nauk Kazakhskoi SSR 6 (1956): 78-108.
  14. Prisyazhnyuk VE. and Soldatova NV. “The Bukharsky Breeding Station. Communication I. Feeding of Goitered Gazelle in an Enclosed Plot on Hilly Sands in Condition of Enclosure”. In: Flint VE. (ed.) Nauchnye Osnovy Okhrany I Ratsionalnogo Zhivotnogo Mira. Vsesoyuznyi Nauchno-Issledovatelsky Institut Okhrany Pritrody I Zapovednogo Dela, Moscow (1984): 28-43.
  15. Uztemur A and Orman A. “Ensuring the Reproduction of Gazelles, Whose Numbers Are Decreasing in Türkiye and Whose Habitats Are Confined to a Narrow Region, in New Habitats”. Journal of Research in Veterinary Medicine 41 (2022): 127-132.
  16. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. “National Species Conservation Strategy of Türkiye”. T.C. Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı, Ankara, Türkiye (2023).
  17. Durmus M. “Determination of Home Range Size and Habitat Selection of Gazelles (Gazella subgutturosa) by GPS Telemetry in Şanlıurfa”. MSc thesis, Middle East Technical University, Turkey (2010): 31669370.
  18. Alvarez-Estape M., et al. “Insights from the Rescue and Breeding Management of Cuvier’s Gazelle (Gazella cuvieri) through Whole-Genome Sequencing”. Evolutionary Applications 15 (2022): 351-364.
  19. Kock RA., et al. “Role of Veterinarians in Re-Introductions”. International Zoo Yearbook 41 (2007): 24-37.
  20. Soares JF., et al. “Causes of Mortality of Captive Arabian Gazelles (Gazella arabica) at King Khalid Wildlife Research Centre, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, from 1988 to 2011”. Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine1 (2015): 1-8.
  21. Purohit , et al. “Genetic effects of long‑term captive breeding in the pygmy hog (Porcula salvania)”. Peer Journal 9 (2021): e12212.
  22. Speak SA., et al. “Genomics‑informed captive breeding can reduce inbreeding depression and the genetic load in zoo populations”. Molecular Ecology Resources 24 (2014): e13967.
  23. Miranda OG., et al. “Biased birth sex ratios of mammals and birds in zoos”. Scientific Reports 15 (2025): e20506.
  24. Rietkerk FE., et al. “Population Dynamics of a Captive Herd of Arabian Sand Gazelles”. In: Spitz F., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the International Symposium ‘Ongulés/Ungulates.’ 91 (1992): 379-382.
  25. Riesch R., et al. “Reproductive Life History of Sand Gazelles”. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society1 (2013): 116-127.
  26. Soares J., et al. “Long-Term Mortality Monitoring of Captive Sand Gazelles (Gazella marica): Assessment and Recommendation”. Veterinary Sciences and Medicine1 (2021): 1-8.
  27. Kirkwood J.K., et al. “Perinatal Mortality and Season of Birth in Captive Wild Ungulates”. The Veterinary Record 120 (1987): 386-390.
  28. Martin R.A., et al. “Maternal Provisioning and Paternal Genetic Quality: Predictors of Short- and Long-Term Offspring Survival in Gazella arabica”. Current Zoology 69 (2023): 643-653.
  29. Clutton-Brock TH. “Reproductive Success: Studies of Individual Variation in Contrasting Breeding Systems”. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1988): 548.
  30. Ibáñez B., et al. “Juvenile Mortality in Captive Endangered Gazelles”. Animal Conservation1 (2013): 108-117.
  31. Kaya ÖF. “New Steppic Syntaxa from Southeastern Anatolia (Şanlıurfa, Turkey)”. Acta Botanica Gallica 158 (2011): 189-204.
  32. El-Sheikh MA., et al. “Vegetation of Thumamah Nature Park: A Managed Arid Land Site in Saudi Arabia”. Rendiconti Lincei 24 (2013): 349-367.
  33. Mohammed OB., et al. “Captive Breeding and Reintroduction of Arabian Mountain and Sand Gazelles in Saudi Arabia”. Proceedings of the World Association of Wildlife Veterinarians, 27th World Veterinarian Congress, Tunesia (2002): 11-14.
  34. Kingswood S. and Blank D. “Gazella subgutturosa”. Mammalian Species 518 (1996): 1-10.
  35. Murtskhvaladze M., et al. “Gene Introgression Between Gazella subgutturosa and G. marica: Limitations of Maternal Inheritance Analysis for Species Identification with Conservation Purposes”. Acta Theriologica 57 (2012): 383-386.
  36. Uztemur A., et al. “Partial Characterization of the Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) in Gazelles (Gazella marica) in Şanlıurfa Province”. Journal of Research in Veterinary Medicine 43 (2024a): 126-131.
  37. Blank D. “The Behavioral Biology and Conservation of Goitered Gazelles (Gazella subgutturosa)”. Springer, Cham, Switzerland (2025): 750.
  38. Wacher T., et al. “Phylogenetic Analysis of Mitochondrial DNA Sequences Reveals Polyphyly in the Goitered Gazelle (Gazella subgutturosa)”. Conservation Genetics 12 (2011): 827-831.
  39. Harrison DL and Bates PJJ. “The Mammals of Arabia”. Harrison Zoological Museum Publication, Sevenoaks, Kent, UK (1991): 354.
  40. Moreno E and Espeso G. “International Studbook. Cuvier’s Gazelle (Gazella cuvieri)”. CSIC, Roquetas de Mar, Almería (2008): 140.
  41. Cunningham PL and Wronski T. “Sex Ratio of Arabian Sand Gazelle (Gazella subgutturosa marica Thomas, 1897) in the Mahazat as-Sayd Protected Area”. Mammalia 75 (2011): 243-248.
  42. Alados CL and Escós JM. “Variation in the Sex Ratio of Low Dimorphic Polygynous Species with High Levels of Maternal Reproductive Effort: Cuvier’s Gazelle”. Ethology, Ecology and Evolution 6 (1994): 301-311.
  43. López-Cortegano E., et al. “Genetic purging in captive endangered ungulates with long-lived individuals”. Scientific Reports 11 (2021): e20898.
  44. Landete-Castillejos T., et al. “Age-Related Foetal Sex Ratio Bias in Iberian Red Deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus): Are Male Calves Too Expensive for Growing Mothers?” Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 56 (2004): 1-8.
  45. Anderson K. “Retrospective evaluation of histopathologic findings in captive gazelle species”. Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine 47 (2016): 113-119.
  46. Soares JF., et al. “Mortality of Captive Mountain Gazelles (Gazella gazella) at King Khalid Wildlife Research Centre, Saudi Arabia, 1988-2011”. Proceedings of the 61st Conference of the Wildlife Disease Association, Lyon, France (2012).
  47. Soares JF., et al. “Mortality of Captive Sand Gazelles (Gazella marica) at King Khalid Wildlife Research Centre, Saudi Arabia, 1988-2011”. Proceedings of the International Conference on Diseases of Zoo and Wild Animals IZW and EAZW, Tiergarten Schönbrunn, Vienna, Austria (2013).
  48. Blank DA and Yang W. “Strategy of Goitered Gazelle Suckling Behavior”. Mammalian Research 60 (2015): 393-401.
  49. Uztemur A and Orman A. “Correlation Between Body Measurements of Gazella marica Fawns After Weaning and Estimating Body Weight from These Measurements”. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 30 (2024): 611-618.
  50. Uztemur A., et al. “Features of Suckling Behaviour of Gazella marica Fawns in Semi-Captive Conditions”. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences 34 (2024b): 127-132.
  51. Lamglaït B. “Retrospective review of causes of mortality in captive springboks (Antidorcas marsupialis)”. Journal of Zoo and Aquarium Research 8 (2020): 159-165.
  52. Müller DWH., et al. “Less Can Be More: Considering Seasonal Differences of Newborn Mortality in Breeding Regimes”. Proceedings of the International Conference on Diseases of Zoo and Wild Animals 2 (2010): 96-98.
  53. Stojanovic D., et al. “Effects of non‑random juvenile mortality on small, inbred populations”. Biological Conservation 275 (2022): e109792.
  54. Müller DWH., et al. “A Retrospective Analysis of Necropsy Reports and Stock-Data of the Soemmerring’s Gazelle (Gazella soemmerringii) at Al Wabra Wildlife Preservation (AWWP), Qatar”. Proceedings of the International Conference on Diseases of Zoo and Wild Animals 1 (2009): 279-283.

Citation

Citation: Torsten Wronski.,et al. “Private Versus Professional: Offspring Sex, Litter Composition and Neonate Mortality in Two Gazelle Husbandry Regimes".Acta Scientific Veterinary Sciences 7.12 (2025): 03-13.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2025 Torsten Wronski.,et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.




Metrics

Acceptance rate35%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days
Impact Factor1.008

Indexed In





News and Events


  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be provided with the Publication Certificate after their successful publication
  • Last Date for submission
    Authors are requested to submit manuscripts on/before January 23, 2025, for the Second issue of 2026.

Contact US