Acta Scientific Veterinary Sciences (ISSN: 2582-3183)

Research Article Volume 7 Issue 10

Live Feed: Importance of Aqua-Hatchery

R Batista-Ramos1, L García-Delgado4, S Mireles-Flores4, C Olmo-González4, I Aguilera-Garces2, B López-Valoy2, D Verdecia-Acosta2, C Lemus-Flores3 and F Grageola-Nuñez3

1Sree Meenakshi Arts and Science College, Affiliated to Periyar University, Eriyur, Pennagaram (Tk), Dharmapuri District, Tamil Nadu, India
2P.G. and Research Department of Zoology, C. Abdul Hakeem College (Autonomous), Affiliated to Thiruvalluvar University, Melvisharam, Ranipet District, Tamil Nadu, India
3P.G. and Research Department of Zoology, Government Arts College for Men, Affiliated to Periyar University, Krishnagiri, Tamil Nadu, India
4Fish Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Zoology, Ayya Nadar Janaki Ammal College (Autonomous), Affiliated to Madurai Kamaraj University, Sivakasi, Virudhunagar District, Tamil Nadu, India
5P.G. and Research Department of Zoology, Government Arts College, Dharmapuri, Tamil Nadu, India
6Aquatic Sciences and Biotechnology Laboratory, PG and Research Department of Zoology, Ethiraj College for Women(Autonomous), Affiliated to University of Madras, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
7Rajiv Gandhi Centre for Aquaculture, Artemia Project, Tharuvaikulam, Ottapidaram (Tk), Tuticorin District, Tamil Nadu, India
8Marine Planktonology and Aquaculture Laboratory, Department of Marine Science, School of Marine Sciences, Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu, India
9PG and Research Department of Zoology, National College (Autonomous), Affiliated to Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu, India
10Institution of Marine Biology, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung, Taiwan
11Biodiversity Research Center, Earth, Climate and Ocean Research Foundation, Kochi, Kerala
12Crustacean Biology Laboratory, Department of Zoology, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India

*Corresponding Author: Narasimman Manickam, Sree Meenakshi Arts and Science College, Affiliated to Periyar University, Eriyur, Pennagaram (Tk), Dharmapuri District, Tamil Nadu, India.

Received: September 08, 2025; Published: September 23, 2025

Abstract

Live food organisms encompass all forms of phytoplankton and zooplankton that are consumed by economically significant aqua-hatchery species, which include the early stages of finfish and shellfish. Generally, zooplankton feed on phytoplankton, establishing phytoplankton as the foundation of the food chain. These live foods are capable of swimming within the water column and are consistently accessible to fish and shellfish larvae, which are likely to trigger a feeding response in the larvae. In natural environments, the majority of finfish and shellfish larvae consume small organisms of both phytoplanktonic and zooplanktonic nature. The success of hatchery production for fish fingerlings intended for stocking in grow-out production systems is significantly reliant on the availability of appropriate live food to nourish fish larvae, fry, and fingerlings. Live food organisms are rich in essential nutrients, including proteins, lipids, carbohydrates, vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and fatty acids, and are therefore often referred to as "living capsules of nutrition." The provision of suitable live food at the right time is crucial for maximizing the growth and survival rates of young finfish and shellfish.

Keywords: Live Feed; Zooplankton; Cladoceran; Copepod; Nutrients; Finfish; Shellfish

References

  1. Manickam., et al. “Influence of wild mixed zooplankton on growth and muscle composition of the freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii post larvae”. Aquaculture 522 (2020b): 1-9.
  2. Chadhuri and Chaudhuri. “ In: Beyond 2000 New Horizons. 2. Daya Publishing House, Chap (2008): 21.
  3. Agh and Sorgeloos. “Handbook of protocols and guidelines for culture and enrichment of live food for use in larviculture”. In: Laboratory of Aquaculture and Artemia Reference Center. University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium (2005): 1-60.
  4. Manickam., et al. “Evaluation of nutritional profiles of wild mixed zooplankton in Sulur and Ukkadam Lakes of Coimbatore, South India”. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 17 (2017b): 509-517.
  5. “Global aquaculture: Current trends and challenges for the 21st century”. In: Anans do Aquacultura Brasil 98.1 (1998): 2-6.
  6. Tiwari. “Live feed culture, Silver jubilee celebrations”. In: Hi Tech Aquaculture, Open House (1986): 1-15.
  7. David. “Status of marine aquaculture in relation to live prey: past, present and future. In: Josianne, G.S., Lesley, A.M. (Eds.), Live Feeds In Marine Aquaculture. Blackwell public, UK (2003): 1-16.
  8. Mandal., et al. “Feeding of aquarium fishes with natural and artificial foods: available options and future needs”. Aqua International 3 (2009): 20-23.
  9. “A review of pond zooplankton production and fertilization for the culture of larval and fingerling striped bass”. Aquaculture 35 (1983): 353-369.
  10. “Zooplankton: its biochemistry and significance in aquaculture”. Naga, ICLARM, Quart 20.2 (1997): 8-14.
  11. Gopalakrishnan. “Larval rearing of red shrimp Penaeus marginatus”. Aquaculture 9 (1976):
  12. Mondal., et al. “Importance of live feed in aquaculture”. International Journal of Science and Research Development 6 (2018): 656-658.
  13. Arnott., et al. “Effects of food quality and quantity on the survival, development and egg production of Gladioferens pectinatus (Brady) (Copepoda: Cala-noida)”. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 37 (1986): 467-473.
  14. Anonymous., et al. “Prawn programme; in Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Centre”. Annual Report (1976):
  15. James and Martin Thompson. “Production of copepods in an outdoor culture tank”. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Coastal Aquaculture 4 (1986): 1275-1280.
  16. Emerson and “The effect of stocking density on the growth, development and survival of Penaeus in-dicus Nilne Edwards larvae”. Aquaculture 23 (1981): 45.
  17. Vanhaecke., et al. “The biogeography of Artemia: An updated review. In Artemia Research and Its Application, ed. P. Sorgeloos, D. Bengtson, W. Decleir, and E. Jaspers 1 (1987): 129-155. Wetteren: Universa Press.
  18. Triantaphylidis., et al. “Review of the biogeography of the genus Artemia (Crustacea, Anostraca)”. Journal of Biogeography 25 (1998): 213-226.
  19. Veeramani., et al. “Introduction to Artemia Culture. In: Basic and Applied Zooplankton Biology (Eds. P. Santhanam. A. Begum and P. Perumal)”. Springer Nature (2019): 209-224.
  20. Bossier., et al. “An RFLP database for authentication of commercial cyst samples of the brine shrimp Artemia (International Study on Artemia LXX)”. Aquaculture 231 (2004): 93-112.
  21. Iveleva. “Mass cultivation of Invertebrates Biology and Methods”. Translated from Russi on, Isreal Program for Scientific translation, Jerulelem (1973):
  22. Altaff and “Culture of Ceriodaphnia cornuta, Using Chicken Manure as Fertilizer: Conversion of Waste Product into Highly Nutritive Animal Protein”. Culture of C. cornuta on Chicken Manure. Biological Sciences-PJSIR 53.2 (2010): 89-91.
  23. “Indigenous Live Feed for Aqua-Hatchery Larval Rearing of Finfish and Shellfish: A Review”. International Journal of Zoological Investigations 6.1 (2020): 162-173.
  24. Olsen., et al. “Effects of algal addition on stability of fatty acids and some water-soluble vitamins in juvenile. Artemia franciscana”. Aquaculture Nutrition 6 (2000): 263-273.
  25. Rajkumar., et al. “Laboratory culture of calanoid copepod, Acartia clausi Giesbrecht”. Applied Fisheries and Aquaculture 4 (2004): 5-8.
  26. “Status of marine aquaculture in relation to live prey: Past, present and future”. In: Live Feeds in Marine Aquaculture, (eds.) Josianne GS and Lesley AM), Blackwell Science Ltd, U.K (2003): 1-16.
  27. El-Amad. “Determination of optimal feeding rates for different developmental stages of Penaeus semiculcatus using various live food organisms”. Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research, Kuwait (1982):
  28. “Effect of some ecological factors on the growth of the copepod Schizopera elatensis, a potential food organism for hatcheries”. 15th European Marine Biology $ymposium, Kiel. Kieler Meeresforsch., Sonderh 5 (1981): 544-553.
  29. “Laboratory culture of a Harpacticoid copepod Laophonte setosa (Boeck)”. Ibid (1977): 563-570.
  30. Maruyama., et al. “Application of unicellular algae Chlorella vulgaris for the mass culture of marine rotifer Brachionus”. Hydrobiologia 358 (1997): 133-138.
  31. Martin., et al. “Complete and partial replacement of Artemia nauplii by Moina micura during early post larval culture of white shrimp Litopenaeus schmitti”. Aquaculture Nutrition 12 (2003): 89- 96.
  32. Das., et al. “Important live food organisms and their role in aquaculture”. In: Frontiers in Aquaculture, (ed.) Munilkumar, Sukham Narendra Publishing House (2012): 69-86.
  33. Altaff. “Breeding biology of the freshwater copepod, Heliodiaptomus viduus (Gurney) and its prospects as live food organism”. Pakistan Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research 46 (2003): 180-187.
  34. Kahan and “Laboratory cultivation of Nitocra spinipes Boeck from the solar pond (Gulf of Aqaba Red sea). In: H. Rosenthan and O.H. Oren (Eds) Research on Intensive Aquaculture. European Maricult. Soc. Spec. Publ. Bredene, Belgium 6 (1981): 117-132.
  35. Evjemo., et al. “Copepods as live food organisms in the larval rearing of halibut larvae (Hippoglossus hippoglossus ) with special emphasis on the nutritional value”. Aquaculture 227 (2003): 191-210.
  36. Dhert and Sorgeloos. “Live feeds in aquaculture”. Infofish International95 (1995): 31-39.
  37. Saboor Abdus and Altaff. “Diversity of Zooplankton of Adyar estuary”. Pollution Research 24 (2005): 135-142.

Citation

Citation: Narasimman Manickam., et al. “Live Feed: Importance of Aqua-Hatchery".Acta Scientific Veterinary Sciences 7.10 (2025): 40-47.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2025 Narasimman Manickam., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.




Metrics

Acceptance rate35%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days
Impact Factor1.008

Indexed In





News and Events


Contact US