Acta Scientific Pharmaceutical Sciences

Research Article Volume 10 Issue 1

Frog Toxin Types: Their Biological Effects and Therapeutic Uses

Arunima Yadav and Ravi Kant Upadhyay*

Department of Zoology, D D U Gorakhpur University, Gorakhpur, 273009. U.P. India

*Corresponding Author: Ravi Kant Upadhyay, Department of Zoology, D D U Gorakhpur University, Gorakhpur, 273009. U.P. India.

Received: December 01, 2025; Published: December 19, 2025

Abstract

This article describes various toxins derived from skin glands of various frog species, along with their pharmacological and therapeutic uses. Most of these toxic compounds from skin glands, are used to protect against harmful microorganisms, parasites, and predators. These can be used as diagnostic tools, mainly experimental molecules to validate postulated therapeutic targets. This article discusses various toxins secreted from frog skin glands, primarily examining their antimicrobial, insulinotropic, antitrypanosomal, hemolytic, wound-healing, anti-HIV, and insecticidal properties. Bufadienolides exhibited cytotoxic, antitumor, anticancer, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, and analgesic activities. These are also used to create drug libraries, prototypes for drug design, cosmeceuticals, therapeutic agents and traditional medicines. This review suggests the use of frog toxin, may contribute to the development of novel therapeutic molecules for managing infectious diseases.

Keywords: Bufadienolides; Cytotoxic; Antitumor; Antimicrobial and Analgesic Activity

References

  1. Raaymakers C., et al. “A New Family of Diverse Skin Peptides from the Microhylid Frog Genus Phrynomantis”. Molecules (2020): 912.
  2. Corrêa BAAP., et al. “Report of envenomation in humans by handling a dyeing poison frog Dendrobates tinctorius (Schneider, 1799) (Anura: Dendrobatidae) in the Amazon”. Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical 54 (2020): e04612020.
  3. Lin Y., et al. “Ranatensin-HL: A Bombesin-Related Tridecapeptide from the Skin Secretion of the Broad-Folded Frog, Hylarana latouchii”. Molecules7 (2017): 1110.
  4. Zhou X., et al. “Pharmacological Effects of Two Novel Bombesin-Like Peptides from the Skin Secretions of Chinese Piebald Odorous Frog (Odorranasch mackeri) and European Edible Frog (Pelophylax kl. esculentus) on Smooth Muscle”. Molecules10 (2017): 1798.
  5. Rádis-Baptista G., et al. “Cell-Penetrating Peptides Derived from Animal Venoms and Toxins”. Toxins (Basel)2 (2021): 147.
  6. Vallejo JR., et al. “Histological Study of Glandular Variability in the Skin of the Natterjack Toad-Epidalea calamita (Laurenti, 1768)-Used in Spanish Historical Ethnoveterinary Medicine and Ethnomedicine”. Veterinary Sciences8 (2022): 423.
  7. Mo GX., et al. “A Novel Insulinotropic Peptide from the Skin Secretions of Amolops loloensis Frog”. Natural Products and Bioprospecting5 (2014): 309-313.
  8. , et al. “Baltikinin: A New Myotropic Tryptophyllin-3 Peptide Isolated from the Skin Secretion of the Purple-Sided Leaf Frog, Phyllomedusa baltea”. Toxins (Basel) 8.7 (2016): 213.
  9. Fusco LS., et al. “Biochemical characterization and cytotoxic effect of the skin secretion from the red-spotted Argentina frog Argenteo hylasiemersi (Anura: Hylidae)”. Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins 26 (2020): e20190078
  10. Jeckel AM ., et al. “The relationship between poison frog chemical defenses and age, body size, and sex”. Frontiers in Zoology 12 (2015): 27.
  11. Jared C, et al. “Skin gland concentrations adapted to different evolutionary pressures in the head and posterior regions of the caecilian Siphonops annulatus”. Scientific Report1 (2018): 3576.
  12. Rodriguez C., et al. “Antimicrobial Secretions of Toads (Anura, Bufonidae): Bioactive Extracts and Isolated Compounds against Human Pathogens”. Antibiotics (Basel)12 (2020): 843.
  13. Gong Y., et al. “Structural and bio-functional assessment of the postaxillary gland in Nidirana pleuraden (Amphibia: Anura: Ranidae)”. Zoological Letter 6 (2020): 7.
  14. Antoniazzi MM., et al. “Reproductive behaviour, cutaneous morphology, and skin secretion analysis in the anuran Dermatonotus muelleri”. iScience4 (2022): 104073.
  15. Gowda RM., et al. “Toad venom poisoning: resemblance to digoxin toxicity and therapeutic implications”. Heart4 (2003): e14.
  16. Bordon KCF., et al. “From Animal Poisons and Venoms to Medicines: Achievements, Challenges and Perspectives in Drug Discovery”. Frontiers in Pharmacology 11 (2020): 1132.
  17. Zou D., et al. “Bufadienolides originated from toad source and their anti-inflammatory activity”. Frontiers in Pharmacology 13 (2022): 1044027.
  18. Chen N., et al. “The advancement of structure, bioactivity, mechanism, and synthesis of bufotalin”. Steroids 214 (2025): 109555.
  19. Daly JW., et al. “Histrionicotoxins: roentgen-ray analysis of the novel allenic and acetylenie spiroalkaloids isolated from a Colombian frog, Dendrobates histrionicus”. (1971).
  20. Khodorov BI., et al. “Batrachotoxin as a tool to study voltage-sensitive sodium channels of excitable membranes”. Progress in Biophysics & Molecular Biology 45.2 (1985): 57-148.
  21. Wang SY., et al. “Single rat muscle Na+ channel mutation confers batrachotoxin autoresistance found in poison-dart frog Phyllobates terribilis”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences39 (2017): 10491-10496.
  22. , et al. “Dart-Poison Frogs”. Scientific American (1983): 120-133.
  23. , et al. “Dart Poison Frogs and their Toxins”. The ASA (Applied Science and Analysis) Newsletter (2000): 99-95.
  24. Schofield GG., et al. “The effect of pumiliotoxin-B on the excitability of bullfrog sympathetic neurons”. European Journal of Pharmacology1 (1988): 39-48.
  25. Chen K. K.,et al. .“Pharmacology and toxicology of toad venom”. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 56 (1967): 1535-1541.
  26. Zohrab F., et al. “Biological Properties, Current Applications and Potential Therapeutic Applications of Brevinin Peptide Superfamily”. International Journal of Peptide Research and Therapeutics1 (2019): 39-48.
  27. Xi X., et al. “A review on bradykinin-related peptides isolated from amphibian skin secretion”. Toxins (Basel)3 (2015): 951-70.
  28. Brunetti AE., et al. “Odorous secretions in anurans: morphological and functional assessment of serous glands as a source of volatile compounds in the skin of the treefrog Hypsiboas pulchellus (Amphibia: Anura: Hylidae)”. Journal of Anatomy3 (2016): 430-442.
  29. Anastasi A., et al. “Isolation and structure of bombesin and alytesin, two analogous active peptides from the skin of the European amphibians Bombina andalytes”. Experientia 27 (1971): 166-167.
  30. RončevićT., et al. “Parallel identification of novel antimicrobial peptide sequences from multiple anuran species by targeted DNA sequencing”. BMC Genomics1 (2018): 827
  31. Ong D., et al. “Protein Composition and Biomedical Potential of the Skin Secretion of Hylaranaery thraea (Schlegel, 1837) (Anura: Ranidae) from Langkawi Archipelago, Kedah, Peninsular Malaysia”. International Journal of Peptide Research and Therapeutics 3 (2021): 2125-2133.
  32. Jeong MC., et al. “Investigation of cationicity and structure of pseudin-2 analogues for enhanced bacterial selectivity and anti-inflammatory activity”. Scientific Report1 (2017): 1455.
  33. Amatya R., et al. “Drug Delivery Strategies for Enhancing the Therapeutic Efficacy of Toxin-Derived Anti-Diabetic Peptides”. Toxins (Basel)5 (2020): 313.
  34. Cruz e Carvalho A., et al. “Cytotoxic Activity and Antiproliferative Effects of Crude Skin Secretion from Physalaemus nattereri (Anura: Leptodactylidae) on in vitro Melanoma Cells”. Toxins (Basel)10 (2015): 3989-4005.
  35. Chen Q., et al. “Amphibian-Derived Natural Anticancer Peptides and Proteins: Mechanism of Action, Application Strategies, and Prospects”. International Journal of Molecular Sciences18 (2023): 13985.
  36. Bókony V., et al. “Toads phenotypically adjust their chemical defences to anthropogenic habitat change”. Scientific Report1 (2019): 3163.
  37. Pabijan M., et al. “Evolutionary principles guiding amphibian conservation”. Evolutionary Applications5 (2020): 857-878.
  38. Crossland MR., et al. “Chemical cues that attract cannibalistic cane toad (Rhinella marina) larvae to vulnerable embryos”. Scientific Report1 (2021): 12527.
  39. Douglas TE, et al. “Trade-offs between cost of ingestion and rate of intake drive defensive toxin use”. Biological Letter2 (2022): 20210579.
  40. Hossie TJ., et al. “Increasing availability of palatable prey induces predator-dependence and increases predation on unpalatable prey”. Scientific Report 11 (2021): 6763.
  41. Wei S., et al. “Characteristics of hemolytic activity induced by skin secretions of the frog Kaloula pulchra hainana”. Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins1 (2013): 9.
  42. Armstrong CE., et al. “Electrical properties of frog saccular hair cells: distortion by enzymatic dissociation”. Journal of Neuroscience8 (1998): 2962-2973.
  43. Chang J., et al. “Bv8-Like Toxin from the Frog Venom of Amolopsjing dongensis Promotes Wound Healing via the Interleukin-1 Signaling Pathway”. Toxins (Basel)1 (2017): 15.
  44. Han Liu et al, “A potential wound healing-promoting peptide from frog skin”. The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology 49 (2014): 32-41.
  45. Coelho GR., et al. “Neglected Venomous Animals and Toxins: Underrated Biotechnological Tools in Drug Development”. Toxins (Basel)12 (2021): 851.
  46. Ni G., et al. “Comparative proteomic study of the antiproliferative activity of frog host-defence peptide Caerin 1.9 and its additive effect with Caerin 1.1 on TC-1 cells transformed with HPV16 E6 and E7”. Biomed Research International (2018).
  47. Ni G., et al. “Host-defense peptides Caerin 1.1 and 1.9 stimulate TNF-alpha-dependent apoptotic signals in human cervical cancer HeLa cells”. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology 8 (2020): 676.
  48. Weldon PJ., et al. “A common pumiliotoxin from poison frogs exhibits enantioselective toxicity against mosquitoes”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences47 (2006): 17818-17821.
  49. Williams CR., et al. “Toxicity of green tree frog (Litoria caerulea) skin secretion to the blowflies Calliphora stygia (Fabricius) and Lucilia cuprina (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Calliphoridae)”. Austral Entomology 1 (1998): 85-89.
  50. Williams CR., et al. “Mosquito repellents in frog skin”. Biological Letter2 (2006): 242-245.
  51. Trindade FT., et al. “Insecticidal activity of Leptodactylus knudseni and Phyllomedusa vaillantii crude skin secretions against the mosquitoes Anopheles darlingi and Aedes aegypti”. Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins 20 (2014): 28.
  52. Pitschmann V., et al. “Military Importance of Natural Toxins and Their Analogs”. Molecules5 (2016): 556.
  53. Vandendriessche T., et al. “Modulation of voltage-gated Na+ and K+ channels by pumiliotoxin 251D: a “joint venture" alkaloid from arthropods and amphibians”. Toxicon3 (2008): 334-344.
  54. Yin P H., et al. “Anti-tumor activity and apoptosis-regulation mechanisms of bufalin in various cancers: New hope for cancer patients”. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention (2012): 5339-5343.
  55. Yang EH., et al. “Digitalis toxicity: a fading but crucial complication to recognize”. American Journal of Medicine 125 (2012): 337-343.
  56. Chen N., et al. “The advancement of structure, bioactivity, mechanism, and synthesis of bufotalin”. Steroids 214 (2025): 109555.
  57. Zohrab F., et al. “Biological Properties, Current Applications and Potential Therapeutic Applications of Brevinin Peptide Superfamily”. International Journal of Peptide Research and Therapeutics1 (2019): 39-48.
  58. Cui X., et al. “Anti-hepatitis B virus activities of cinobufacini and its active components bufalin and cinobufagin in HepG2.2.15 cells”. Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin10 (2010): 1728-1732.
  59. Xie JT., et al. “Cardiac toxicity of resibufogenin: electrophysiological evidence”. Acta Pharmacologica Sinica4 (2009): 289-297.
  60. Costa TO., et al. “Occurrence of bufotenin in the Osteocephalus genus (Anura: Hylidae)”. Toxicon 4 (2005): 371-375.
  61. El-Seedi HR., et al. “Chemistry and the Potential Antiviral, Anticancer, and Anti-Inflammatory Activities of Cardiotonic Steroids Derived from Toads”. Molecules19 (2022): 6586
  62. Zhao L., et al. “Toxicokinetics of Arenobufagin and its Cardiotoxicity Mechanism Exploration Based on Lipidomics and Proteomics Approaches in Rats”. Frontiers in Pharmacology 12 (2021): 780016.

Citation

Citation: Arunima Yadav and Ravi Kant Upadhyay. “Frog Toxin Types: Their Biological Effects and Therapeutic Uses". Acta Scientific Pharmaceutical Sciences 10.1 (2026): 18-30.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2026 Arunima Yadav and Ravi Kant Upadhyay. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.




Metrics

Acceptance rate32%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days

Indexed In




News and Events


  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be provided with the Publication Certificate after their successful publication
  • Last Date for submission
    Authors are requested to submit manuscripts on/before February 10, 2026, for the second issue of 2026.

Contact US