Acta Scientific Neurology (ASNE) (ISSN: 2582-1121)

Review Article Volume 4 Issue 9

The Effect of Functional Electrical Stimulation on Gait in Patients After Stroke: Review of Scientific

Guryanova EA1,3*, Kovalchuk VV2, Tikhoplav OA3 and Litvak FG4

1GAU APE "Postgraduate Doctors’ Training Institute" of the Ministry of Health of the Chuvash Republic, Cheboksary, Russia
2ST Petersburg State Budget Institution of Health "City Hospital No. 38 IM. N.A. SEMASHKO", Centre for Medical Rehabilitation, St. Petersburg, Pushkin, Russia
3Federal State Budget Institution of Higher Education "Chuvash State University THEM. I.N. Ulyanova", Cheboksary, Russia
4ITC INTEGRAL LLC, Moscow, Russia

*Corresponding Author: Prabhu MR, Research Assistant, Central Research Lab, Rajarajeswari Medical College and Hospital, Karnataka, India.

Received: June 11, 2021; Published: July 19, 2021


The article provides a systematic review of the results of the researches on the effectiveness of the application of functional electrical stimulation (FES) for low extremities during the rehabilitation of patients after stroke. It is considered the effect of using FES on the improvements of walking speed, kinematics and gait symmetry, the ability to overcome obstacles, as well as improvements in the range of ankle movement and foot clearance while walking. In addition, it is discussed the positive impact of FES on muscle tone, on reducing the energy consumption and the risk of falls during walking, increased confidence and comfort of patients when walking with FES. This analysis also considers the speed of patients’ adaptation and their tolerance for FES devices, provides a comparative characteristic of functional electrical stimulation with using other ankle orthoses (AFO).

Keywords: Stroke; Rehabilitation; FES: Functional Electrical Stimulation; Gait Disorder; Gait Restoration; Motor Recovery


  1. Ababkov VA., et al. “Nevrologija: nacional'noe rukovodstvo”. Moskva, 2018. Tom 1 (2-e izdanie, pererabotannoe i dopolnennoe) (2018).
  2. Weerdesteyn V., et al. “Falls in individuals with stroke”. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 45 (2008): 1195-1213.
  3. Lin PY., et al. “The relation between ankle impairments and gait velocity and symmetry in people with stroke”. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation4 (2006): 562-568.
  4. Lamontagne A., et al. “Contribution of passive stiffness to ankle plantarflexor moment during gait after stroke”. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation3 (2000): 351-358.
  5. Taga G. “A model of the neuro-musculo-skeletal system for anticipatory adjustment of human locomotion during obstacle avoidance”. Biological Cybernetics1 (1998): 9-17.
  6. Weerdesteyn V., et al. “Advancing age progressively affects obstacle avoidance skills in the elderly”. Human Movement Science 5-6 (2005): 865-880.
  7. Schmid A., et al. “Improvements in Speed-Based Gait Classifications Are Meaningful”. Stroke 38 (2007): 2096-2100.
  8. Hsu A-L., et al. “Analysis of impairments influencing gait velocity and asymmetry of hemiplegic patients after mild to moderate stroke”. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 84 (2003): 1185-1193.
  9. Wei TS., et al. “Gait asymmetry, ankle spasticity, and depression as independent predictors of falls in ambulatory stroke patients”. PLoS One5 (2017): e0177136.
  10. Motl RW., et al. “Energy cost of walking and its parameters, daily activity and fatigue in persons with mild to moderate Multiple Sclerosis”. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 26 (2012): 1015-1021.
  11. De Groot MH., et al. “Fatigue associated with stroke and neurologic conditions: implications for stroke rehabilitation”. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 84 (2003): 1714-1720.
  12. Klinicheskie rekomendacii po vedeniyu bol'nyh s ishemicheskim insul'tom i tranzitornymi ishemicheskimi atakami (2017).
  13. Diagnostika i reabilitaciya narushenij funkcii hod'by i ravnovesiya pri sindrome central'nogo gemipareza v vosstanovitel'nom periode insul'ta.
  14. Stroke rehabilitation in adults. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2016).
  15. “Functional electrical stimulation for drop foot of central neurological origin”. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2009).
  16. National clinical guideline for stroke. Royal College of Physicians. Fifth Edition October (2016).
  17. Hebert D., et al. “Canadian stroke best practice recommendations: Stroke rehabilitation practice guidelines, update 2015”. International Journal of Stroke 4 (2016): 459-484.
  18. Liberson WT., et al. “Functional electrotherapy: stimulation of the peroneal nerve synchronized with the swing phase of the gait of hemiplegic patients”. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 42 (1961): 101.
  19. Liberson WT and Offner FF. “Method of muscular stimulation in human being to aid in walking”. US Patent 3 344 792 (1967).
  20. Moe JH and Post HW. “Functional electrical stimulation for ambulation in hemiplegia”. Lancet 82 (1962): 285.
  21. Vitenzon AS and Petrushanskaja KA. “Fiziologicheskie obosnovanija metoda iskusstvennoj korrekcii dvizhenij posredstvom programmiruemoj jelektrostimuljacii myshc pri hod'be”. Rossijskij Zhurnal Biomehaniki 48 (2010): 7-27.
  22. Vitenzon AS and Petrushanskaja KA. “K fazovomu analizu hod'by i nekotoryh ritmicheskih dvizhenij cheloveka”. Rossijskij Zhurnal Biomehaniki1 (2005): 19-35.
  23. Barrett C and Taylor P. “The effects of the odstock drop foot stimulator on perceived quality of life for people with stroke and multiple sclerosis”. Neuromodulation1 (2010): 58-64.
  24. Ethne L Nussbaum., et al. “Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation for Treatment of Muscle Impairment: Critical Review and Recommendations for Clinical Practice”. Physiotherapy 5 (2017): 1-76.
  25. C Marquez-Chin and MR Popovic. “Functional electrical stimulation therapy for restoration of motor function after spinal cord injury and stroke: a review”. BioMedical Engineering OnLine 19 (2020): 34.
  26. Miller L., et al. “A comparison of the orthotic effect of the Odstock Dropped Foot Stimulator and the WalkAide functional electrical stimulation systems on energy cost and speed of walking in Multiple Sclerosis”. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology6 (2015): 482-485.
  27. Gil-Castillo., et al. “Advances in neuroprosthetic management of foot drop: a review”. Advances in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation46 (2020): 1-19.
  28. Dobkin BH., et al. “Reliability and Validity of Bilateral Ankle Accelerometer Algorithms for Activity Recognition and Walking Speed After Stroke”. Stroke8 (2011): 2246-2250.
  29. Barrett C., et al. “The effects of the odstock drop foot stimulator on perceived quality of life for people with stroke and multiple sclerosis”. Neuromodulation 1 (2010): 58-64.
  30. Wilkinson IA., et al. “A randomized controlled trial of integrated electrical stimulation and physiotherapy to improve mobility for people less than 6 months post stroke”. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 14 (2017): 1-7.
  31. Gervasoni E., et al. “Effects of functional electrical stimulation on reducing falls and improving gait parameters in multiple sclerosis and stroke”. PMR 4 (2017): 339-347.
  32. Dujovic S., et al. “Novel multi-pad functional electrical stimulation in stroke patients: A single-double blind randomized study”. Neuro Rehabilitation4 (2017): 791-800.
  33. Shiels J., et al. “A mixed methods service evaluation of a pilot functional electrical stimulation clinic for the correction of dropped foot in patients with chronic stroke”. Primary Health Care Research and Development 12 (2011): 187-199.
  34. Morone G., et al. “Walking Training with Foot Drop Stimulator Controlled by a Tilt Sensor to Improve Walking Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study in Patients with Stroke in Subacute Phase”. Stroke Research Treatment 2012 (2012): 523-564.
  35. Taylor P., et al. “The long-term cost- effectiveness of the use of Functional Electrical Stimulation for the correction of dropped foot due to upper motor neuron lesion”. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine2 (2013): 154-160.
  36. Van Swigchem R., et al. “Effect of Peroneal Electrical Stimulation Versus an Ankle-Foot Orthosis on Obstacle Avoidance Ability in People with Stroke- Related Foot Drop”. Physical Therapy92 (2012): 398-406.
  37. Bethoux F., et al. “The Effects of Peroneal Nerve Functional Electrical Stimulation Versus Ankle-Foot Orthosis in Patients With Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial”. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair7 (2014): 688-697.
  38. Everaert DG., et al. “Effect of a foot-drop stimulator and ankle-foot orthosis on walking performance after stroke: a multicenter randomized controlled trial”. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair7 (2013): 579-591.
  39. Yan TB., et al. “Effects of functional electrical stimulation on the improvement of motor function of patients with acute stroke: a randomized controlled trial”. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi37 (2006): 2627-2631.
  40. Sheffler LR., et al. “Randomized controlled trial of surface peroneal nerve stimulation for motor relearning in lower limb hemiparesis”. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 94 (2013): 1007-1014.
  41. Ghedira M., et al. “Wireless, accelerometry-triggered peroneal nerve stimulation in spastic paraparesis: A randomized, controlled pilot”. Official Journal of RESNA2 (2017): 99-105.
  42. Van Swigchem R., et al. “Near-Normal Gait Pattern with Peroneal Electrical Stimulation as a Neuroprosthesis in the Chronic Phase of Stroke: A Case Report”. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 92 (2011): 320-324.
  43. Van Swigchem R., et al. “Is transcutaneous Peroneal stimulation beneficial to patients with chronic stroke using an ankle-foot orthosis? A within subjects study of patients’ satisfaction, walking speed and physical activity level”. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 42 (2010): 117-121.
  44. Street T., et al. “Training and orthotic effects related to functional electrical stimulation of the peroneal nerve in stroke”. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 49 (2017): 1-7.
  45. Prenton S., et al. “Functional Electrical Stimulation Versus Ankle Foot Orthoses for Foot-Drop: A Meta-Analysis of Orthotic Effects”. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine8 (2016): 646-656.
  46. Jaqueline da Cunha M., et al. “Functional electrical stimulation of the peroneal nerve improves post-stroke gait speed when combined with physiotherapy. A systematic review and meta-analysis”. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (2020): S1877-0657 (20)30091-9.
  47. Kyeongjin L. “Balance Training with Electromyogram-Triggered Functional Electrical Stimulation in the Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients”. Brain Science2 (2020): 80.


Citation: Guryanova EA., et al. “The Effect of Functional Electrical Stimulation on Gait in Patients After Stroke: Review of Scientific Literature". Acta Scientific Neurology 4.9 (2021): 23-32.


Copyright: © 2021 Guryanova EA., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.


Acceptance rate32%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days

Indexed In

News and Events

  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.
  • Submission Timeline for Upcoming Issue
    The last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is July 10, 2024.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of "Best Article of the Issue"
  • Welcoming Article Submission
    Acta Scientific delightfully welcomes active researchers for submission of articles towards the upcoming issue of respective journals.

Contact US