Acta Scientific Medical Sciences (ASMS)(ISSN: 2582-0931)

Research Article Volume 9 Issue 7

Prevalence of Genetic Disorders and the Role of Prenatal Screening: A Retrospective Study in Dahod, Gujarat

Sarthi Kabrawala1,2, Mohd Tariq1*, Gunwant Chaudhri2 and Rakesh Kumar2

1Department of Life Sciences, Parul Institute of Applied Sciences, Parul University, Vadodara, Gujarat-391760, India
2Department of Anatomy, Zydus Medical College and Hospital, Dahod, Gujarat-389151, India

*Corresponding Author: Mohd Tariq, Department of Life Sciences, Parul Institute of Applied Sciences, Parul University, Vadodara, Gujarat-391760, India.

Received: April 22, 2025; Published: June 23, 2025

Abstract

Genetic disorders pose significant public health concerns due to their impact on individuals and healthcare systems. Early prenatal screening plays a crucial role in identifying chromosomal abnormalities, enabling timely intervention. This study examines the prevalence of genetic disorders and their correlation with antenatal check-ups in hospitals of Dahod, Gujarat.

A retrospective observational study was conducted using antenatal check-up reports from hospitals in Dahod. Data from 306 pregnant women aged 18–51 years were analyzed. Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) was employed to detect chromosomal abnormalities, including Trisomy 21 (T21), Trisomy 18 (T18), and Trisomy 13 (T13). Additional confirmatory methods, such as karyotyping and chromosomal microarray analysis, were utilized. Data analysis was performed using SPSS statistical version 20.

Among the 306 participants, 7 cases (2.2%) were NIPT-positive, including 6 cases of T21, 1 case of T18, and no cases of T13. A significant association was observed between advanced maternal age and an increased prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities (p < 0.05). Follow-up data revealed that one case resulted in pregnancy termination, while another led to spontaneous abortion.

NIPT demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity in detecting fetal chromosomal abnormalities, reinforcing its value in prenatal screening. However, false-positive rates highlight the necessity for confirmatory diagnostic tests. Advanced maternal age was recognized as a key risk factor for genetic disorders, underscoring the importance of routine antenatal check-ups.

This study emphasizes the significance of prenatal screening in reducing the prevalence of genetic disorders. Raising awareness among pregnant women and integrating genetic counselling into antenatal care can enhance early diagnosis and improve pregnancy outcomes. Future research should focus on expanding follow-up studies to further validate these findings.

 Keywords: Prenatal Screening; Genetic Disorders; Chromosomal Abnormalities; Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT); Antenatal Check-Ups; Pregnancy Outcomes; Genetic Counselling

References

  1. An N., et al. "Clinical and Cytogenetic Results of a Series of Amniocentesis Cases from Northeast China: A Report of 2500 Cases”. Genetics and Molecular Research 4 (2015): 15660-15667.
  2. Colah Roshan B., et al. "Sickle Cell Disease in Tribal Populations in India”. Indian Journal of Medical Research 5 (2015): 509-515.
  3. Gekas Jean., et al. "Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing for Fetal Chromosome Abnormalities: Review of Clinical and Ethical Issues”. The Application of Clinical Genetics (2016): 15-26.
  4. Girotra Siaa., et al. "Utilization and Determinants of Adequate Quality Antenatal Care Services in India: Evidence from the National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5) (2019-21)”. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1 (2023): 800.
  5. Hayata Kei., et al. "Discrepancy between Non-Invasive Prenatal Genetic Testing (NIPT) and Amniotic Chromosomal Test Due to Placental Mosaicism: A Case Report and Literature Review”. Acta Medica Okayama 2 (2017): 181-185.
  6. Junhui Wan., et al. "Evaluation of the Z-Score Accuracy of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing for Fetal Trisomies 13, 18 and 21 at a Single Center”. Prenatal Diagnosis6 (2021): 690-696.
  7. Kumar G., et al. "Utilisation, Equity and Determinants of Full Antenatal Care in India: Analysis from the National Family Health Survey 4”. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth1 (2019).
  8. Lee HY., et al. "Trends in the Quality of Antenatal Care in India: Patterns of Change across 36 States and Union Territories, 1999-2021”. Journal of Global Health 14 (2024).
  9. Li CL., et al. "Analysis of 34,800 Cases of Abnormal Hemoglobinopathy in Couples of Child-Bearing Age in Chongqing Area”. Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi4 (2020): 1316-1320.
  10. Pradhan S., et al. "Indian Genetic Disease Database”. Nucleic Acids Research 39 (2010): D933-D938.
  11. Rahman M A., et al. "Socioeconomic Inequalities in Utilizing Maternal Health Care in Five South Asian Countries: A Decomposition Analysis”. PLOS ONE2 (2024): e0296762.
  12. Sago Haruhiko., et al. "Nationwide Demonstration Project of Next-Generation Sequencing of Cell-Free DNA in Maternal Plasma in Japan: 1-Year Experience”. Prenatal Diagnosis4 (2015): 331-336.
  13. Zhang Miaomiao., et al. "Value of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing in the Detection of Rare Fetal Autosomal Abnormalities”. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology 284 (2023): 5-11.
  14. Zhang Yi., et al. "Chromosomal Mosaicism Detected by Karyotyping and Chromosomal Microarray Analysis in Prenatal Diagnosis”. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine1 (2021): 358-366.

Citation

Citation: Mohd Tariq., et al. “Prevalence of Genetic Disorders and the Role of Prenatal Screening: A Retrospective Study in Dahod, Gujarat”.Acta Scientific Medical Sciences 9.7 (2025): 80-84.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2025 Mohd Tariq., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.




Metrics

Acceptance rate30%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days
Impact Factor1.403

Indexed In





Contact US