Acta Scientific Medical Sciences (ASMS)(ISSN: 2582-0931)

Research Article Volume 9 Issue 5

Impact of Post-Operative Follow-Up on Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in the Saudi Arabian Population: A Retrospective Cohort Study During the COVID-19 Era

Lujain Alshareef1*, Fadhel Alzahrani2, Fatimah Al Luhaybi1, Ghania Alfahmi1, Sarah Alkashgry2 and Alwahaj Khogeer2

1Medical Intern, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
2Consultant of General Surgery, Upper GI and Bariatric Surgery, King Abdullah Medical City, Makkah, Saudi Arabia

*Corresponding Author: Lujain Alshareef, Medical Intern, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.

Received: February 20, 2025; Published: April 21, 2025

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) is a widely utilized bariatric procedure for treating obesity and related comorbidities. However, the impact of lockdown during COVID-19 lockdowns on postoperative follow-up care and long-term outcomes of LSG, particularly in the Saudi Arabian population, remains underexplored. This study aims to evaluate the influence of follow-up care on weight loss, complication rate, and resolution comorbidities in patients undergoing LSG.

Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 148 patients who underwent LSG at King Abdullah Medical City in Makkah, Saudi Arabia, between May 1, 2019, and December 30, 2020. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the duration of follow-up: no follow-up (n = 54) and more than one year of follow-up (n = 94). Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, postoperative complications, and comorbidity resolution were compared between these two groups. The primary outcome measured was the reduction in Body Mass Index (BMI), while secondary outcomes included complication rates and the resolution of diabetes mellitus and hypertension.

Results: The mean BMI reduction was 13.43 ± 9.62 in the no-follow-up group and 14.34 ± 7.68 in the group with more than one year of follow-up, with no statistically significant difference observed (p = 0.527). Complications were more frequent in the follow-up group (77.1%) compared to the no-follow-up group (22.9%), approaching statistical significance (p = 0.051). Specific complications, such as leaks, bleeding, and weight regain, were observed only in the follow-up group. Additionally, the resolution of diabetes mellitus (80% vs. 20%) and hypertension (66.7% vs. 33.3%) was higher in the follow-up group, though these differences were not statistically significant.

Conclusion: The findings suggest that regular follow-up care after LSG is important for early detecting and managing of post-operative complications. While no significant difference in BMI reduction was observed between the two groups, the higher prevalence of complications in the follow-up group underscores the importance of ongoing monitoring to optimize patient outcomes.

 Keywords: Obesity; World Health Organization (WHO); Saudi Arabia

References

  1. Fares S., et al. “Safety and Efficacy of Metabolic Surgery in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in the Middle East and North Africa Region: An Analysis of Primary Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy Outcomes”. Journal of Clinical Medicine15 (2023): 5077.
  2. Jaacks LM., et al. “The obesity transition: stages of the global epidemic”. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinology3 (2019): 231-240.
  3. Blüher M. “Obesity: global epidemiology and pathogenesis”. Nature Reviews Endocrinology 5 (2019): 288-298.
  4. Heymsfield S., et al. “Clinical perspectives on obesity treatment: challenges, gaps, and promising opportunities”. Nam Perspectives (2018).
  5. Islam QT and Reza IB. “Obesity–A global Burden, Crucial Problem for the Society”. Bangladesh Journal of Medicine2 (2018): 75-83.
  6. Rubino F and Castagneto M. “Surgery for severe obesity: indications, techniques, mechanisms of weight loss and diabetes resolution”. Immunology, Endocrine and Metabolic Agents in Medicinal Chemistry (Formerly Current Medicinal Chemistry-Immunology, Endocrine and Metabolic Agents)1 (2006): 127-136.
  7. Noria SF., et al. “Weight Regain After Bariatric Surgery: Scope of the Problem, Causes, Prevention, and Treatment”. Current Diabetes Reports 3 (2023): 31-42.
  8. Alqahtani SA., et al. “Obesity Burden and Impact of Weight Loss in Saudi Arabia: A Modelling Study”. Advances in Therapy 3 (2023): 1114-1128.
  9. Alfadda AA., et al. “Long-Term Weight Outcomes after Bariatric Surgery: A Single Center Saudi Arabian Cohort Experience”. Journal of Clinical Medicine21 (2021): 4922.
  10. Althumiri NA., et al. “Obesity in Saudi Arabia in 2020: Prevalence, Distribution, and Its Current Association with Various Health Conditions”. Healthcare (Basel)3 (2021): 311.
  11. Dohayan Al-Dohayan A., et al. “Cost effectiveness of bariatric surgery in patients with obesity related comorbidities: A retrospective study”. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care 12 (2021): 4418-4422.
  12. Schlottmann F and Buxhoeveden R. “Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Surgical Technique and Tips for Success”. Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques - Part A 8 (2021): 938-943.
  13. Malapan K., et al. “Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banded Plication (Lagbp): Standardization of Surgical Technique and Analysis of Surgical Outcomes”. Obesity Surgery1 (2016): 85-90.
  14. Oliak D., et al. “Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass”. Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques 17 (2003): 405-408.
  15. , et al. “Initial outcomes of one anastomosis gastric bypass at a single institution”. Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity 12 (2018): 35-41.
  16. Sucandy I., et al. “Outcome analysis of early laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy experience”. JSLS 4 (2013): 602-606.
  17. Schouten R., et al. “Long-term results of bariatric restrictive procedures: a prospective study”. Obesity Surgery12 (2020): 1617-1626.
  18. Bou Daher H and Sharara AI. “Gastroesophageal reflux disease, obesity and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: The burning questions”. World Journal of Gastroenterology33 (2019): 4805-4813.
  19. Angrisani L., et al. “Bariatric Surgery Survey 2018: Similarities and Disparities Among the 5 IFSO Chapters”. Obesity Surgery5 (2021): 1937-1948.
  20. Sieber P., et al. “Five-year results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy”.Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases2 (2014): 243-249.
  21. Uittenbogaart M., et al. “Long-Term Results of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbid Obesity: 5 to 8-Year Results”. Obesity Surgery6 (2017): 1624.
  22. Hirth DA., et al. “Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: long-term weight loss outcomes”. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases 5 (2015): 1004-1007.
  23. Albanese A., et al. “Laparoscopic Gastric Plication: An Emerging Bariatric Procedure with High Surgical Revision Rate”. Bariatric Surgical Practice and Patient Care 3 (2015): 93-98.
  24. Youssef A., et al. “The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on bariatric patients' self-management post-surgery”.Appetite 162 (2021):
  25. Yang C., et al. “Remote Follow-up with a Mobile Application Is Equal to Traditional Outpatient Follow-up After Bariatric Surgery: the BELLA Pilot Trial”. Obesity Surgery 6 (2023): 1702-1709.
  26. Moreno T., et al. “COVID-19 Lockdown and Impact on 2-Year Weight Loss in a Bariatric Center”.Obesity Facts1 (2024): 90-97.
  27. Sjöström L., et al. “Association of bariatric surgery with long-term remission of type 2 diabetes and with microvascular and macrovascular complications”.JAMA22 (2014): 2297-2304.
  28. Salminen P., et al. “Effect of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy vs Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass on Weight Loss at 5 Years Among Patients With Morbid Obesity: The SLEEVEPASS Randomized Clinical Trial”.JAMA3 (2014): 241-254.
  29. Boza C., et al. “Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a stand-alone procedure for morbid obesity: report of 1,000 cases and 3-year follow-up”. Obesity Surgery6 (2012): 866-871.
  30. Masry MAME and Fiky MAME. “Long-Term Outcome of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) on Weight Loss in Patients with Obesity: a 5-Year and 11-Year Follow-Up Study”. Obesity Surgery10 (2023): 3147-3154.
  31. Kraljević M., et al. “Long-term Effects of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: What Are the Results Beyond 10 Years?”. Obesity Surgery8 (2021): 3434-3435.
  32. Murtha JA., et al. “Impact of COVID-19 on the Postoperative Bariatric Surgery Patient Experience”.Annals of Surgery4 (2023): e745-e751.
  33. Sawada M., et al. “Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the glycemic control, eating habits, and body compositions of people with diabetes mellitus: A retrospective longitudinal observational study”.Journal of Diabetes Investigation 2 (2021): 321-328.
  34. Huang EY., et al. “Despite regression of healthy lifestyle habits, weight loss after bariatric surgery is not affected during the COVID-19 pandemic”.Surgery Endoscopy1 (2023): 607-612.
  35. Fatani B., et al. “Behavioral Changes in Patients With Diabetes During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study”. Cureus2 (2023): e34956.
  36. Alkhaldy A., et al. “General and Postbariatric Nutritional Knowledge among Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery”.Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism 2019 (2019):
  37. Stephenson J., et al. “Health-related outcomes in patients enrolled on surgical and non-surgical routes in a weight management service”. Health Science Report2 (2022): e501.
  38. Powell R., et al. “Psychological preparation and postoperative outcomes for adults undergoing surgery under general anaesthesia”.Cochrane Database System Review 5 (2016): CD008646.
  39. Martinez M., et al. “Motivation for weight loss among completers of a free community-based weight loss program in a US-Mexico border region: A self-determination theory perspective”.Frontiers in Public Health 10 (2016):

Citation

Citation: Lujain Alshareef., et al. “Impact of Post-Operative Follow-Up on Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in the Saudi Arabian Population: A Retrospective Cohort Study During the COVID-19 Era”.Acta Scientific Medical Sciences 9.5 (2025): 150-157.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2025 Lujain Alshareef., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.




Metrics

Acceptance rate30%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days
Impact Factor1.403

Indexed In





Contact US