Acta Scientific Medical Sciences (ASMS)(ISSN: 2582-0931)

Research Article Volume 7 Issue 4

Factors Affecting the Design of MARPE Appliance: A Scoping Review

Priyank Rai1* and Veenita Gupta2

1Senior Professor, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Maulana Azad Institute of Dental Sciences, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi, India
2Post-Graduate Student, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Maulana Azad Institute of Dental Sciences, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi, India

*Corresponding Author: Priyank Rai, Senior Professor, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Maulana Azad Institute of Dental Sciences, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi, India.

Received: February 08, 2023; Published: March 01, 2023


Background: Treatment of transverse maxillary deficiency is of paramount importance. Though Rapid Palatal Expansion (RPE) and Surgically Assisted Palatal Expansion (SARPE) are established treatment modalities, treatment in adolescents and young adults can be accomplished using a more conservative approach like Mini-Implant Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion (MARPE). Various factors affect the success of MARPE. This scoping review aims to list down the various factors affecting the success of MARPE appliance in treatment of transverse maxillary deficiency.

Methodology: The literature search was carried out on MEDLINE via Pubmed, Cochrane Library (Cochrane database of systematic reviews), Cochrane central register of controlled trials (CENTRAL), Google Scholar and ScienceDirect, for articles from 2010 to January 2023. Pertinent articles were selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. The results were tabulated based on number of cortices used as anchorage, number of implants used in the appliance, type of anchor support used, placement site of implant and positioning of the expander.

Results: The literature search resulted in 9 relevant articles. Among all the studies, two studies discussed monocortical versus bicortical placement of implants, one study assessed for positioning of the expander. Only one study compared for number of implants used whereas two studies assessed for site of implant placement. Three studies assessed for anchor support.

Conclusion: Due to heterogeneity in the literature, it is difficult to arrive at a definitive conclusion as to which design is the best for the treatment of transverse deficiency in adolescents and young adult patients. Design has to be customized as per the needs and requirements of the case.

Keywords: MARPE, Miniscrew Assisted Palatal Expansion; Bone Borne Expansion; Tooth-bone Borne Expansion; Palatal Expansion


  1. da Silva Filho OG., et al. “Epidemiology of posterior crossbite in the primary dentition”. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry 1 (2007): 73-78.
  2. HAAS AJ. “The treatment of maxillary deficiency by opening the midpalatal suture”. The Angle Orthodontist 35 (1965): 200-217.
  3. McNamara JA. “Maxillary transverse deficiency”. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics5 (2000): 567-570.
  4. Garib DG., et al. “Periodontal effects of rapid maxillary expansion with tooth-tissue-borne and tooth-borne expanders: a computed tomography evaluation”. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 129 (2006): 749-758.
  5. Rungcharassaeng K., et al. “Factors affecting buccal bone changes of maxillary posterior teeth after rapid maxillary expansion”. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics4 (2007): 428.e1-428.e8.
  6. Lee KJ., et al. “Miniscrew-assisted nonsurgical maxillary expansion before orthognathic surgery for a patient with severe mandibular prognathism”. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 137 (2010): 830-839.
  7. Brunetto DP., et al. “Non-surgical treatment of transverse deficiency in adults using Microimplant-assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion (MARPE)”. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics 1 (2017): 110-125.
  8. Jia H., et al. “Comparison of skeletal maxillary transverse deficiency treated by microimplant-assisted rapid palatal expansion and tooth-borne expansion during the post-pubertal growth spurt stage”. The Angle Orthodontist1 (2021): 36-45.
  9. Seong EH., et al. “Evaluation of the effects of miniscrew incorporation in palatal expanders for young adults using finite element analysis”. Korean Journal of Orthodontics 2 (2018): 81-89.
  10. Celenk-Koca T., et al. “Evaluation of miniscrew-supported rapid maxillary expansion in adolescents: A prospective randomized clinical trial”. The Angle Orthodontist6 (2018): 702-709.
  11. Bazargani F., et al. “Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects using tooth-borne and tooth-bone-borne RME appliances: a randomized controlled trial with 1-year follow-up”. European Journal of Orthodontics 3 (2021): 245-253.
  12. Lagravère MO., et al. “Transverse, vertical, and anteroposterior changes from bone-anchored maxillary expansion vs traditional rapid maxillary expansion: a randomized clinical trial”. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics3 (2010): 304.e1-12; discussion 304-305.
  13. Gunyuz Toklu M., et al. “Periodontal, dentoalveolar, and skeletal effects of tooth-borne and tooth-bone-borne expansion appliances”. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics1 (2015): 97-109.
  14. Lim HM., et al. “Stability of dental, alveolar, and skeletal changes after miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion”. Korean Journal of Orthodontics 5 (2017): 313-322.
  15. “Miniscrew Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion (Marpe) - ExpandingHorizons To Achieve An Optimum In Transverse Dimension: A Review”. European Journal of Molecular and Clinical Medicine2 (2021): 389-403.
  16. GUPTA V and RAI P. “Factors affecting the design of marpe appliance: a scoping review”. (2020).
  17. Li N., et al. “Skeletal effects of monocortical and bicortical mini-implant anchorage on maxillary expansion using cone-beam computed tomography in young adults”. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics5 (2020): 651-661.
  18. Oliveira CB., et al. “Evaluation of factors related to the success of miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion”. The Angle Orthodontist2 (2021): 187-194.
  19. Cantarella D., et al. “Changes in the midpalatal and pterygopalatine sutures induced by micro-implant-supported skeletal expander, analyzed with a novel 3D method based on CBCT imaging”. Progress in Orthodontics1 (2017): 34.
  20. Canan S and Şenışık NE. “Comparison of the treatment effects of different rapid maxillary expansion devices on the maxilla and the mandible. Part 1: Evaluation of dentoalveolar changes”. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics6 (2017): 1125-1138.
  21. Hee Soo Oh., et al. “Comparison of traditional RPE with two types of Micro-implant Assisted RPE: CBCT study”. Seminars in Orthodontics (2019).
  22. Sarraj M., et al. “Comparison of skeletal and dentoalveolar changes between pure bone-borne and hybrid tooth-borne and bone-borne maxillary rapid palatal expanders using cone-beam computed tomography”. APOS Trends in Orthodontics 11 (2021): 32-40.
  23. Lin L., et al. “Tooth-borne vs bone-borne rapid maxillary expanders in late adolescence”. The Angle Orthodontist2 (2015): 253-262.
  24. MacGinnis M., et al. “The effects of micro-implant assisted rapid palatal expansion (MARPE) on the nasomaxillary complex--a finite element method (FEM) analysis”. Progress in Orthodontics1 (2014): 52.
  25. Clement Evan A and Krishnaswamy NR. “Skeletal and Dentoalveolar Changes after Skeletal Anchorage-assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion in Young Adults: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study”. APOS Trends in Orthodontics 7 (2017): 113-119.
  26. Ngan P., et al. “Skeletal, Dentoalveolar, and Periodontal Changes of Skeletally Matured Patients with Maxillary Deficiency Treated with Microimplant‐assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion Appliances: A Pilot Study”. APOS Trends in Orthodontics (2018).
  27. Park JJ., et al. “Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes after miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion in young adults: A cone-beam computed tomography study”. Korean Journal of Orthodontics2 (2017): 77-86.


Citation: Priyank Rai and Veenita Gupta. “Factors Affecting the Design of MARPE Appliance: A Scoping Review”.Acta Scientific Medical Sciences 7.4 (2023): 02-09.


Copyright: © 2022 Priyank Rai and Veenita Gupta. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.


Acceptance rate30%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days
Impact Factor1.403

Indexed In

News and Events

  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.
  • Submission Timeline for Upcoming Issue
    The last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is June 25, 2024.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of "Best Article of the Issue"
  • Welcoming Article Submission
    Acta Scientific delightfully welcomes active researchers for submission of articles towards the upcoming issue of respective journals.

Contact US