ACTA SCIENTIFIC CLINICAL CASE REPORTS

Research Article Volume 5 Issue 1

Are We Over Investigating Non-Visible Haematuria, Time to Change Imaging Strategies?

Melhem Motaz1, Wani Mudassir2, Burki Javid3, Zubair Bhat3, Omar Algurabi1, Shahbaz Mehmood1, Laith Abawi4, Vyrus Eleftheria5, Michael Conroy5 and Gilani Syed1

1Urology Registrar, Medway Maritime Hospital, Kent, UK
2ST4 Urology Trainee, Royal Glamaorgan Hospital, Cardiff, UK
3Urology Consultant, University College London Hospital, UK
4SHO Surgery, Medway Maritime Hospital, Kent, UK
5SHO, Medway Maritime Hospital, Kent, UK

*Corresponding Author: Gilani Syed, Urology Registrar, Medway Maritime Hospital, Kent, UK.

Received: November 07, 2023; Published: December 22, 2023

Abstract

Objective: To assess upper tract pathologies and diagnostic accuracy of imaging in patients presenting with haematuria.

Material and Method: We retrospectively analysed data of 821 patients, presenting to the haematuria clinic between January 2019 and January 2020. We recorded type of haematuria, age, sex, family, and occupational history. Results of cystoscopy and diagnostic imaging were collected from records. Involvement of upper tracts and diagnostic accuracy of imaging were assessed.

Results: Out of 821, 438 (58.83%) were male and 338 (41.17%) were female. 536 ( 65%) had non-visible haematuria (NVH) and 286 (35%) had visible haematuria (VH). 117(14%) were active smokers and 238 (27%) were ex-smokers. 9 patients had exposure to chemicals and 34 (4.2%) had a positive family history of urinary tract cancers. 813(99%) had flexible cystoscopy and 795 (97%) had upper tract imaging. 85% had CT Urogram and 46.6% had both CT and ultrasound. 87 (10.7%) patients had bladder tumours. 38 (4.7%) of patients had upper tract pathologies. Urolithiasis was diagnosed in 18(2.2%), and upper tract malignancies in 10(1.2%) of cases. Renal cell carcinoma was diagnosed in 6 (0.73%), and upper tract urothelial cancer in 4 (0.48%) of cases. 93.75% of patients with upper tract malignancies presented with visible haematuria. CT urogram had 100% diagnostic accuracy. Ultrasound was diagnostic in 93% of cases (16/17).

Conclusion: The prevalence of upper renal tract malignancies is very low in patients presenting with NVH. This is the time to risk stratify patients with non-visible haematuria and tailor the diagnostic imaging. Ultrasound can replace CT urogram in patients with NVH, further comparative studies are required.

Keywords: Haematuria; CT Urogram; Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer; Ultrasound

References

  1. Mariani AJ., et al. “The significance of adult hematuria: 1,000 hematuria evaluations including a risk-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis”. Journal of Urology 141 (1989): 350-355.
  2. Khadra MH., et al. “A prospective analysis of 1,930 patients with hematuria to evaluate current diagnostic practice”. Journal of Urology2 (2000): 524-527.
  3. Lippmann QK., et al. “Evaluation of microscopic hematuria and risk of urologic cancer in female patients”. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2 (2017): 146.e1-146.
  4. Rai BP., et al. “Systematic Review of the Incidence of and Risk Factors for Urothelial Cancers and Renal Cell Carcinoma Among Patients with Haematuria”. European Urology2 (2022): 182-192.
  5. Chlapoutakis K., et al. “Performance of computed tomographic urography in diagnosis of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma, in patients presenting with hematuria: systematic review and meta-analysis”. European Journal of Radiology 73 (2010): 334-338.
  6. Tan WS., et al. “Who Should Be Investigated for Haematuria? Results of a Contemporary Prospective Observational Study of 3556 Patients”. European Urology1 (2018): 10-14.
  7. Barocas DA., et al. “Microhematuria: AUA/SUFU Guideline”. Journal of Urology4 (2020): 778-786.
  8. Jefferies ER., et al. “Urological recommendations from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Guideline, June 2015: Suspected cancer: recognition and referral”. BJU International6 (2016): 857-860.
  9. Horie S., et al. “Japanese guidelines of the management of hematuria 2013”. Clinical and Experimental Nephrology 5 (2014): 679-689.
  10. Blick CG., et al. “Evaluation of diagnostic strategies for bladder cancer using computed tomography (CT) urography, flexible cystoscopy and voided urine cytology: results for 778 patients from a hospital haematuria clinic”. BJU International1 (2012): 84-94.
  11. Todd Yecies., et al. “Risk of Radiation from Computerized Tomography Urography in the Evaluation of Asymptomatic Microscopic Hematuria”. Journal of Urology5 (2018): 967-972.
  12. Parikh RB., et al. “Getting Real about Health Care Costs - A Broader Approach to Cost Stewardship in Medical Education”. The New England Journal of Medicine 10 (2017): 913-915.
  13. Jubber I., et al. “Non-visible haematuria for the Detection of Bladder, Upper Tract, and Kidney Cancer: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis”. European Urology5 (2020): 583-598.
  14. Duquesne I., et al. “The contemporary role and impact of urine-based biomarkers in bladder cancer”. Translational Andrology and Urology 6 (2017): 1031-1042.
  15. Linder BJ., et al. “Guideline of guidelines: asymptomatic microscopic haematuria”. BJU International2 (2018): 176-183.
  16. Mishriki SF., et al. “Routine urine cytology has no role in hematuria investigations”. Journal of Urology4 (2013): 1255-1258.
  17. Rud E., et al. “Examining the upper urinary tract in patients with hematuria-time to revise the CT urography protocol?”. European Radiology3 (2020): 1664-1670.
  18. Yecies T., et al. “Risk of Radiation from Computerized Tomography Urography in the Evaluation of Asymptomatic Microscopic Hematuria”. Journal of Urology5 (2018): 967-972.
  19. Aycock RD., et al. “Acute Kidney Injury After Computed Tomography: A Meta-analysis”. Annals of Emergency Medicine1 (2018): 44-53.
  20. Smith MR., et al. “Evaluation of Asymptomatic Microscopic Hematuria by Renal Ultrasound to Detect Upper Tract Malignancy: A 20-Year Experience in a Community Hospital”. Urology 133 (2019): 34-39.

Citation

Citation: Gilani Syed., et al. “Are We Over Investigating Non-Visible Haematuria, Time to Change Imaging Strategies?". Acta Scientific Clinical Case Reports 5.1 (2024): 51-55.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2024 Gilani Syed., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.




Metrics

Acceptance rate35%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days

Indexed In



News and Events


  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.
  • Submission Timeline for Upcoming Issue
    The last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is May 10, 2024.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of "Best Article of the Issue"
  • Welcoming Article Submission
    Acta Scientific delightfully welcomes active researchers for submission of articles towards the upcoming issue of respective journals.

Contact US