Acta Scientific Cancer Biology (ISSN: 2582-4473)

Research Article Volume 9 Issue 4

Clinical and Demographic Characteristics of Patients with Breast Carcinoma in Nepal: A Single-Centre Cross Sectional Study

Adhikari Ganga D1*, Sharma Nitu1, Gnawali Suman1, Mandal Sandeep1, Chaudhary Amardeep2, Yadav Ajay Kumar2 and Paudel Sangeeta3

1Department of Radio-Diagnosis, Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, BP Koirala Memorial Cancer Hospital, Bharatpur, Chitwan, Nepal
2Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Centre, Birat Medical College Teaching Hospital, Tankisinuwari, Budiganga-2, Morang, Nepal
3Department of Dermatology, Chitwan Medical college, Bharatpur, Nepal

*Corresponding Author: Adhikari Ganga D, Department of Radio-Diagnosis, Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, BP Koirala Memorial Cancer Hospital, Bharatpur, Chitwan, Nepal.

Received: August 21, 2025; Published: October 14, 2025

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer is a significant health concern in Nepal, ranking as the second most common cancer among women and the third overall cancer in the country. This study aims to evaluate clinical and demographic characteristics of patients with breast carcinoma on the basis of clinical history and Contrast Enhance Computed Tomography (CECT) report at BP Koirala Memorial Cancer Hospital (BPKMCH), Bharatpur, Nepal.

Methodology: Prospective observational study was performed in Department of Radio diagnosis, Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, BPKMCH. Total 209 diagnosed patients with breast carcinoma underwent to CECT of chest and abdomen and clinical history was obtained simultaneously. The different observational study of CECT chest with abdomen was done with the measurement of mass, lymph node size and different other parameters including distance metastasis. Data was analyzed using IBM SPSS version 20 and Microsoft excel. Pearson’s Correlation was used to see the relation between different parameter and significance level was kept at p < 0.05.

Results: Majority of the breast cancer patients (77.50%) were within the age range of 36-65 years. In all 209 patients, mean size tumor size was 37 x 31 x 30 with standard deviation (SD) ± 20.124. Most of the breast cancer patients 115 out of 209 had painless lump i.e. 55.02%, following 90 patients had painful lump i.e. 43.06%. Among all patients, 82 patients had right breast carcinoma i.e.  39.23%, 125 patients had left breast i.e. 59.80% and 2 patients had bilateral breast carcinoma i.e. 00.95%. Similarly, 147 patients had lymph node metastasis i.e. 70.33%, 56 patients didn’t have lymph node metastasis i.e. 26.80% and only 2 patients had reactive lymph node i.e. negligible. 80 patients were at early stage i.e. 38.27% and 129 patients were at advance stage i.e.  61.73%. Most of the patients 188 didn’t have distance metastasis i.e. 89.5% whereas only 21 patients had distance metastasis status i.e. 10.05%.

Conclusion: In our study breast carcinoma was more common within the age range of 35-56 years age. Majority of the breast cancer patients detected at early stage who can be treated as radical treatment. Regular screening of this age group will help to early detection of breast carcinoma.

keywords: Breast Carcinoma; Contrast Enhance Computed Tomography; Distance Metastasis; Lymph Node; Malignant Mass

References

  1. Henry NL., et al. “Chapter 88: Cancer of the Breast”. In: Niederhuber JE, Armitage JO, Doroshow JH, Kastan MB, Tepper JE, eds. Abeloff’s Clinical Oncology. 6th Philadelphia, Pa: Elsevier (2020).
  2. Jagsi R., et al. “Chapter 79: Malignant Tumors of the Breast”. In: DeVita VT, Lawrence TS, Lawrence TS, Rosenberg SA, eds. DeVita, Hellman, and Rosenberg’s Cancer: Principles and Practice of Oncology. 11th Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins (2019).
  3. National Cancer Institute. Physician Data Query (PDQ). Breast Cancer Treatment - Patient Version (2021).
  4. Edge SB., et al. “AJCC (American Joint Committee on Cancer) Cancer Staging Manual. 7th edition”. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag (2010): 347-377.
  5. Groheux D. “Breast Cancer Systemic Staging (Comparison of Computed Tomography, Bone Scan, and 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose PET/Computed Tomography)”. PET Clinic4 (2023): 503-515.
  6. Debra M Ikeda., et al. “Breast Imaging: The Requisites. Elsevier Health. (n.d.). EU Elsevier Health.
  7. Rasuli B and Gaillard F. “Breast cancer (staging)”. Radiopaedia (2008).
  8. You S., et al. “Usefulness of Staging Chest CT in Breast Cancer: Evaluating Diagnostic Yield of Chest CT According to the Molecular Subtype and Clinical Stage”. Journal of Clinical Medicine 5 (2021): 906.
  9. Takalkar UV., et al. “Clinicopathological Profile of Breast Cancer Patients at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Marathwada Region of Westen India”. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention 4 (2016): 2195-2198.
  10. Thakur NA., et al. “Delay in presentation to the hospital and factors affecting it in breast cancer patients attending tertiary care center in Central India”. Indian Journal of Cancer 1 (2015): 102-105.
  11. Sedighi A., et al. “Clinicopathologic characteristics of male breast cancer: a report of 21 cases in radiotherapy center of hamedan, iran”. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention 12 (2013): 7381-7383.

Citation

Citation: Adhikari Ganga D.,et al. “Clinical and Demographic Characteristics of Patients with Breast Carcinoma in Nepal: A Single-Centre Cross Sectional Study".Acta Scientific Cancer Biology 9.4 (2025): 27-33.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2025 Adhikari Ganga D., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.




Metrics

Acceptance rate35%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days
Impact Factor1.183

Indexed In




News and Events


Contact US