Acta Scientific Microbiology

Research Article Volume 9 Issue 8

Influence of Different Solvents on the Extraction of Bioactive Compounds from Acerola Processing Residues

Cinthia Milleny Costa Nascimento1, Renata Pires de Camargo Mascarenhas1,2, Larissa Consoli3 and Natan de Jesus Pimentel-Filho1

1Laboratory of Food Microbiology Advanced Studies (FoMAS), Centro de Ciências da Natureza, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Rodovia Lauri Simões de Barros, Km 12 – SP189, Buri 18290-000, SP, Brazil
2Centro de Ciências e Tecnologias para a Sustentabilidade, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Rodovia João Leme dos Santos, Km 110 – SP-264, Sorocaba 18052-780, SP, Brazil
3Centro de Ciências da Natureza, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Rodovia Lauri Simões de Barros, Km 12 – SP189, Buri 18290-000, SP, Brazil

*Corresponding Author: Natan de Jesus Pimentel-Filho, Laboratory of Food Micro- biology Advanced Studies (FoMAS), Centro de Ciências da Natureza, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Rodovia Lauri Simões de Barros, Km 12 – SP189, Buri 18290- 000, SP, Brazil.

Received: July 16, 2026; Published: July 27, 2026

Abstract

The search for effective strategies to reduce food contamination and the incidence of foodborne diseases has increased interest in natural bioactive compounds as alternatives to synthetic food preservatives. Among these, fruit processing by-products represent promising and sustainable sources of antioxidant compounds. This study evaluated the extraction of bioactive compounds from a seed-rich acerola (Malpighia emarginata DC.) processing residue using different extraction solvents and assessed the antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of the resulting extracts. Hydroethanolic solvents, particularly 50% ethanol, provided the best overall extraction performance, yielding high concentrations of total phenolic compounds (35.26 ± 0.38 mg GAE/100 mL) and vitamin C (1.79 ± 0.05 mg ascorbic acid/100 mL), which were associated with greater antioxidant capacity (1118.22 and 2551.29 μmol TE/L by the DPPH and ABTS assays, respectively). Protein recovery was negligible under the evaluated conditions. Among all extracts, only the acidified 70% ethanol extract exhibited a slight antimicrobial effect against Lactococcus lactis ATCC 19435. Overall, hydroethanolic extraction represents an effective and sustainable approach for recovering antioxidant compounds from seed-rich acerola processing residues. Although the extracts demonstrated considerable antioxidant potential, they exhibited negligible antibacterial activity under the conditions evaluated, supporting their application primarily as antioxidant-rich natural food ingredients.

Keywords: Agro-Industrial By-Products; Biotechnology; Malpighia emarginata DC.; Sustainability; Antimicrobial Activity; Antioxidant Capacity

References

  1. Lake RJ., et al. “WHO estimates of the global, regional, and national burden of 42 foodborne infectious and chemical hazards, 2000-21: an updated data synthesis”. The Lancet Global Health (2026): 103994.
  2. Marques PRC and Trindade RVL. “Panorama Epidemiológico dos Surtos de Doenças Transmitidas Por Alimentos entre 2000 e 2021 no Brasil”. Revista Multidisciplinar em Saúde (2022): 1-10.
  3. Naghavi M., et al. “Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance 1990-2021: a systematic analysis with forecasts to 2050”. The Lancet10459 (2024): 1199-226.
  4. Rashid MH., et al. “Enhancing the shelf stability of fresh-cut potatoes via chemical and nonthermal treatments”. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation6 (2021): e15582.
  5. Sabino BS., et al. “Polysaccharides from acerola, cashew apple, pineapple, mango and passion fruit co-products: Structure, cytotoxicity and gastroprotective effects”. Bioactive Carbohydrates and Dietary Fibre 24 (2020): 100228.
  6. Miskinis RAS., et al. “Bioactive compounds from acerola pomace: A review”. Food Chemistry 404 (2023): 134613.
  7. Silva PB., et al. “Optimization of ultrasound-assisted extraction of bioactive compounds from acerola waste”. Journal of Food Science and Technology 12 (2020): 4627-4636.
  8. Vega-Baudrit JR., et al. “Acerola (Malpighia spp.) Waste: A Sustainable Approach to Nutraceutical, Pharmaceutical, and Energy Applications”. Recycling 6 (2023): 96.
  9. da Silva NC., et al. “A review about acerola (Malpighia emarginata) by-products as a promising raw material for the generation of green products”. Brazilian Journal of Food Technology 26 (2023): e2023039.
  10. Antony C and Narayanaswamy K. “Food preservatives: natural or synthetic?” Archives of Microbiology3 (2026): 134.
  11. Fabián JCP., et al. “Toward safer and sustainable food preservation: a comprehensive review of bacteriocins in the food industry”. Bioscience Reports 04 (2025): 277-302.
  12. Figurek A and Rocha JM. “Sustainable Approaches to Food Processing: A Review of Green Extraction Technologies, Natural Fermentation and Analytical Quality Validation”. Sustainability 12 (2026): 5826.
  13. Chemat F., et al. “Ultrasound assisted extraction of food and natural products. Mechanisms, techniques, combinations, protocols and applications. A review”. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 34 (2017): 540-560.
  14. Flores-Jiménez NT., et al. “Effect of high-intensity ultrasound on the compositional, physicochemical, biochemical, functional and structural properties of canola (Brassica napus) protein isolate”. Food Research International 121 (2019): 947-956.
  15. Rezende YRRS., et al. “Comparison and optimization of conventional and ultrasound assisted extraction for bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity from agro-industrial acerola (Malpighia emarginata DC) residue”. LWT 85 (2017): 158-169.
  16. Silva Guilherme Douglas Freitas., et al. “Avaliação da atividade antimicrobiana do extrato de Malpighia emarginata frente à Escherichia coli e Sthaphylococcus aureus in vitro”. Research, Society and Development3 (2022): e10411326291-e10411326291.
  17. AOAC: Official methods of analysis of Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 18a ed, vol. 1, AOAC Internacional, (2010).
  18. Instituto Adolfo Lutz. “Normas Analíticas do Instituto Adolfo Lutz. Métodos químicos e físicos para análise de alimentos”.4ª. ed., IMESP, (2008).
  19. Singleton VL., et al. “Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of folin-ciocalteu reagent”. Methods in Enzymology 299 (1999): 152-178.
  20. Rufino MSM., et al. “Metodologia Científica: Determinação da Atividade Antioxidante Total em Frutas pela Captura do Radical Livre DPPH”. Comunicado Técnico Online 128 (2007).
  21. Bradford MM. “A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding”. Analytical Biochemistry 1-2 (1976): 248-254.
  22. O’Sullivan JN., et al. "Nisin J, a novel natural nisin variant, is produced by Staphylococcus capitis sourced from the human skin microbiota". Journal of Bacteriology3 (2020): 10-1128.
  23. de Souza LL., et al. "Pressurized liquid extraction and characterization of yacon leaf extracts under different solvent and temperature conditions". Food Research International 220 (2025): 117101.
  24. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility Test; Approved Standand- 10th ed., CLSI document M02-A10, Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute, (2009).
  25. Reis DS., et al. “Produção e estabilidade de conservação de farinha de acerola desidratada em diferentes temperaturas”. Brazilian Journal of Food Technology00 (2017): e2015083.
  26. Do QD., et al. “Effect of extraction solvent on total phenol content, total flavonoid content, and antioxidant activity of Limnophila aromatica”. Journal of Food and Drug Analysis3 (2014): 296-302.
  27. Mourtzinos I and Goula A. “Polyphenols in Agricultural Byproducts and Food Waste”. Polyphenols in Plants (2019): 23-44.
  28. Magalhães MPD., et al. “Obtenção da farinha do resíduo do processamento de acerola e avaliação de compostos bioativos e nutritivos”. Research, Society and Development14 (2021): e188101420714-e188101420714.
  29. Villamil-Galindo E and Piagentini AM. “Sequential ultrasound-assisted extraction of pectin and phenolic compounds for the valorisation of ‘Granny Smith’ apple peel”. Food Bioscience 49 (2022): 101958.
  30. Adeeyo AO., et al. “Tuning water chemistry for the recovery of greener products: pragmatic and sustainable approaches”. RSC Advances10 (2023): 6808-6826.
  31. Alberti A., et al. “Optimisation of the extraction of phenolic compounds from apples using response surface methodology”. Food Chemistry 149 (2014): 151-158.
  32. Ferreira C., et al. “A Comprehensive Review on Deep Eutectic Solvents and Its Use to Extract Bioactive Compounds of Pharmaceutical Interest”. Pharmaceuticals 1 (2024): 124.
  33. Tran TH., et al. “Evaluating phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of the pericarps and seed coats extracts of Macadamia integrifolia and preparing their nanoemulsions”. IJCBS (2023): 215-223.
  34. Alonso-Riaño P., et al. “Water Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction of Polyphenol Compounds from Brewer’s Spent Grain: Kinetic Study, Extract Characterization, and Concentration”. Antioxidants 3 (2020): 265.
  35. Barizão EO., et al. “Optimization of Antioxidant Compounds Extraction from Flesh of New Developed Apple Cultivar Using Response Surface Methodology”. Food Analytical Methods5 (2013): 1407-1415.
  36. Luthria DL. “Optimization of extraction of phenolic acids from a vegetable waste product using a pressurized liquid extractor”. Journal of Functional Foods4 (2012): 842-850.
  37. Shi D., et al. “Optimization of microwave-assisted extraction of wedelolactone from Eclipta alba using response surface methodology”. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering1 (2014): 34-42.
  38. Chen XX., et al. “Optimization of extraction of phenolics from leaves of Ficus virens”. Journal of Zhejiang University: Science B10 (2013): 903-915.
  39. Ghitescu RE., et al. “Optimization of ultrasound-assisted extraction of polyphenols from spruce wood bark”. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 22 (2015): 535-541.
  40. Lima IASI., et al. “Extração de compostos fenólicos do noni (Morinda citrifolia Linn) empregando energia ultrassônica”. Scientia Plena4 (2018).
  41. Pintać D., et al. “Solvent selection for efficient extraction of bioactive compounds from grape pomace”. Industrial Crops and Products 111 (2018): 379-390.
  42. Xia BH., et al. “Green and Efficient Extraction of Phenolic Components from Plants with Supramolecular Solvents: Experimental and Theoretical Studies”. Molecules 9 (2024): 2067.
  43. Mezadri T., et al. “Antioxidant compounds and antioxidant activity in acerola (Malpighia emarginata) fruits and derivatives”. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 21.4 (2008): 282-290.
  44. Poletto P., et al. “Recovery of ascorbic acid, phenolic compounds and carotenoids from acerola by-products: An opportunity for their valorization”. LWT 146 (2021): 111654.
  45. Lima CP., et al. “Conteúdo polifenólico e atividade antioxidante dos frutos da palmeira Juçara (Euterpe edulis Martius)”. Revista Brasileira de Plantas Medicinais 2 (2012): 321-326.
  46. Ozdemir M., et al. “Solvent selection and effect of extraction conditions on ultrasound-assisted extraction of phenolic compounds from galangal (Alpinia officinarum)”. Journal of Applied Research on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants 38 (2024): 100525.
  47. Santos EN., et al. “From waste to wonder: Unleashing the antimicrobial and antioxidant potential of acerola residue using a central composite rotatable design”. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering6 (2023): 111184.
  48. Casagrande M., et al. “Influence of time, temperature and solvent on the extraction of bioactive compounds of Baccharis dracunculifolia: In vitro antioxidant activity, antimicrobial potential, and phenolic compound quantification”. Industrial Crops and Products 125 (2018): 207-219.
  49. Rockenbach II., et al. “Influência do solvente no conteúdo total de polifenóis, antocianinas e atividade antioxidante de extratos de bagaço de uva (Vitis vinifera) variedades Tannat e Ancelota”. Food Science and Technology 28 (2008): 238-244.
  50. Edo GI., et al. “A review on the composition, extraction and applications of phenolic compounds”. Ecological Frontiers 1 (2025): 7-23.
  51. Sancho SO., et al. “Characterization of the industrial residues of seven fruits and prospection of their potential application as food supplements”. Journal of Chemistry 1 (2015): 264284.
  52. Monteiro AS., et al. “Preparation, phytochemical and bromatological evaluation of flour obtained from the acerola (Malpighia punicifolia) agroindustrial residue with potential use as fiber source”. LWT 134 (2020): 110142.

Citation

Citation: Natan de Jesus Pimentel-Filho., et al. “Influence of Different Solvents on the Extraction of Bioactive Compounds from Acerola Processing Resi- dues". Acta Scientific Microbiology 9.8 (2026): 45-57.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2026 Natan de Jesus Pimentel-Filho., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.




Metrics

Acceptance rate30%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days

Indexed In






News and Events


  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be provided with the Publication Certificate after their successful publication
  • Last Date for submission
    Authors are requested to submit manuscripts on/before August 10, 2026, for the upcoming issue of 2026.

Contact US