Padma Priya K H¹*, Radhika Raman² and Sulochan Putli Bai³

¹Senior Resident, Kanchi Kamakoti CHILDS Trust Hospital, India
²Emergency Department, Kanchi Kamakoti CHILDS Trust Hospital, India
³Department of Microbiology, Kanchi Kamakoti CHILDS Trust Hospital, India

*Corresponding Author: Padma Priya KH, Senior Resident, Kanchi Kamakoti CHILDS Trust Hospital, India.

Received: July 28, 2025; Published: August 08, 2025

Abstract

Background: Blood cultures are routinely used in pediatric emergency departments (EDs) to detect bloodstream infections, but their diagnostic yield and clinical utility remain variable.

Objectives: To assess the diagnostic yield of blood cultures in a pediatric ED and to evaluate the associated clinical characteristics, diagnoses, and outcomes of patients undergoing testing.

Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted in the Pediatric Emergency Department from January 2023 to January 2024. Children aged 1 month to 18 years who underwent blood culture testing were enrolled. Clinical data, laboratory results, and outcomes were recorded and analysed.

Results: Of the 716 children included, 94 (13.1%) had positive blood cultures, while 622 (86.9%) were negative. Among the positives, 8.8% were true pathogens and 4.3% were contaminants. Blood cultures were most frequently obtained for gastrointestinal and respiratory symptoms. Salmonella typhi (39.7%) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (15.9%) were the most common pathogens. Coagulase-negative Staphylococci (48.4%) and Pseudomonas spp. (9.7%) were the leading contaminants. Bacterial infections accounted for 72% of positive cultures, with enteric fever, community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), septicaemia, and surgical conditions such as acute appendicitis being the most frequent diagnoses. The diagnostic yield for blood cultures in CAP was low (5.18%). Incomplete immunization showed a trend toward increased bacteraemia risk (p = 0.085). Culture yield varied significantly by timing of collection (day vs. night; p = 0.0045) and monthly admission patterns (p = 0.047).

Conclusions: The diagnostic yield of blood cultures in the pediatric ED was moderate, with a substantial proportion representing contaminants. Enteric fever was the most common bloodstream infection. Optimizing the volume and adherence to strict aseptic precautions during collection of blood culture may enhance diagnostic accuracy and reduce contamination rates.

Keywords: Diagnostic Yield; Ture Pathogens; Contaminants; Timing of Collection; Enteric Fever

References

1. Brockmann VP., et al. “Etiology of acute fever without source in infants consulting at an emergency department”. Revista Chilena de Infectologia: Organo Oficial de la Sociedad Chilena de Infectologia1 (2007): 33-39.
2. Pratt A and Attia MW. “Duration of fever and markers of serious bacterial infection in young febrile children”. Pediatric International 49 (2007): 31-35.
3. Simon AE., et al. “Emergency department laboratory evaluations of fever without source in children aged 3 to 36 months”. Pediatrics 128 (2011): e1368-1375.
4. Girodias JB and Bailey B. “Approach to the febrile child: A challenge bridging the gap between the literature and clinical practice”. Paediatric Child Health 8 (2003): 76-82.
5. Laupland KB., et al. “Blood cultures in ambulatory outpatients”. BMC Infectious Disease 5 (2005): 35.
6. Astete JA., et al. “Blood culture diagnostic yield in a paediatric emergency department”. European Journal of Emergency Medicine 21 (2014): 336-340.
7. Navjyot K Vidwan. “Reducing Contaminated Peripheral Blood Cultures in Our Emergency Room- a Quality Improvement Project”. Pediatrics 149 (2022): 178.
8. Magadia RR and Weinstein MP. “Laboratory diagnosis of bacteremia and fungemia”. Infectious Disease Clinics 4 (2001): 1009-24.
9. Perez-Jorge Emilio V and Steve D Burdette. "Antibiotic therapy for positive blood cultures".
10. Mirrett S., et al. "Relevance of the number of positive bottles in determining clinical significance of coagulase-negative staphylococci in blood cultures”. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 9 (2001): 3279-3281.
11. Richter S., et al. "Minimizing the workup of blood culture contaminants: implementation and evaluation of a laboratory-based algorithm”. Journal of Clinical Microbiology7 (2002): 2437-2444.
12. Aalia B., et al. "Yield of blood cultures in children presenting with febrile illness in a tertiary care hospital”. Pakistan Journal of Physiology1 (2019): 16-20.
13. Berksoy E., et al. "True Bacteremia or Contamination? Predictive Factors for Contamination in Blood Cultures Obtained in the Pediatric Emergency Room”. Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine1 (2023).
14. Chiu IM., et al. "C-Reactive protein concentration can help to identify bacteremia in children visiting the emergency department: a single medical center experience”. Pediatric Emergency Care6 (2020): 291-295.
15. Aiesh Banan M., et al. "Blood culture contamination in a tertiary care hospital: a retrospective three-year study”. BMC Infectious Diseases1 (2023): 448.
16. Pavlovsky M., et al. "Blood culture contamination in pediatric patients: young children and young doctors”. The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 25 (2020): 611-614.

Citation

Citation: Padma Priya K H., et al. “Yield of Blood Culture in Pediatric Emergency Department".Acta Scientific Microbiology 8.9 (2025): 02-18.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2025 Padma Priya K H., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.