Acta Scientific Dental Sciences

Review Article Volume 9 Issue 11

The Evolution of Periodontitis Diagnosis: Understanding the 2017 Grading Criteria

Vishnusripriya J1*, Hemalatha DM2, Sharon S George3 and Sheza Nouren3

1Senior Lecturer, Department of Periodontics, Mahe Institute of Dental Sciences and Hospital, India
2Reader, Department of Periodontics, Mahe Institute of Dental Sciences and Hospital, India
3Third Year BDS Student, Department of Periodontics, Mahe Institute of Dental Sciences and Hospital, India

*Corresponding Author: Vishnusripriya J, Senior Lecturer, Department of Periodontics, Mahe Institute of Dental Sciences and Hospital, India

Received: October 15, 2025; Published: October 30, 2025

Abstract

The 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions introduced a revised framework for the diagnosis and management of periodontitis. A major innovation was the incorporation of grading, designed to supplement disease staging by providing insights into the biological characteristics of periodontitis. Grading reflects the rate of disease progression, anticipated response to therapy, and influence of systemic and behavioral risk factors. Patients are classified as Grade A (slow progression), Grade B (moderate progression), or Grade C (rapid progression), based on clinical attachment loss, radiographic bone loss, and supporting factors such as smoking and diabetes. This system shifts the diagnostic process from a static description of severity to a dynamic model that incorporates risk assessment and future disease trajectory. By integrating both staging and grading, the 2017 classification promotes a more individualized and evidence-based approach to patient care, improving diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment planning in periodontitis.

Keywords: Periodontitis; Classification; Grading; Progression; Risk Modifiers

References

  1. Papapanou PN., et al. “Periodontitis: Consensus report of workgroup 2 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions”. Journal of Periodontology 89 (2018): S173-S182.
  2. Tonetti MS., et al. “Staging and grading of periodontitis: Framework and proposal of a new classification and case definition”. Journal of Periodontology1 (2018): S159-S172.
  3. Armitage GC. “Development of a classification system for periodontal diseases and conditions”. Annals of Periodontology1 (1999): 1-6.
  4. Hefti AF and Preshaw PM. “Examiner alignment and assessment in clinical periodontal research”. Periodontal 2000.1 (2012): 41-60.
  5. Ravida A., et al. “Agreement among international periodontal experts using the 2017 World Workshop classification of periodontitis”. Journal of Periodontology12 (2021): 1675-1686.
  6. Marini L., et al. “The staging and grading system in defining periodontitis cases: Consistency and accuracy amongst periodontal experts, general dentists and undergraduate students”. Journal of Clinical Periodontology2 (2021): 205-215.
  7. Abrahamian L., et al. “Intra- and inter-examiner reliability in classifying periodontitis according to the 2018 classification of periodontal diseases”. Journal of Clinical Periodontology1 (2022): 1-10.
  8. Abou-Arraj RV., et al. “The new periodontal disease classification: Level of agreement on diagnoses and treatment planning at various dental education levels”. Journal of Dental Education10 (2021): 1627-1639.
  9. Eke PI., et al. “Update on prevalence of periodontitis in adults in the United States: NHANES 2009 to 2012”. Journal of Periodontology 5 (2015): 611-622.
  10. Nazir MA. “Prevalence of periodontal disease, its association with systemic diseases and prevention”. International Journal of Health Science (Qassim).2 (2017): 72-80.
  11. Saglam M., et al. “Clinical and biochemical effects of diode laser as an adjunct to nonsurgical treatment of chronic periodontitis, a randomized controlled clinical trial”. Lasers Medicine Science 1 (2014): 37-46.
  12. Hashim NT., et al. “Putative periodontal pathogens in the subgingival plaque of Sudanese subjects with aggressive periodontitis”. Archives of Oral Biology 81 (2017): 97-102.
  13. Doungudomdacha S., et al. “Enumeration of Porphyromonas gingivalis, Privately intermedia and Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans in subgingival plaque samples by a quantitative-competitive PCR method”. Journal of Medical Microbiology10 (2000): 861-874.
  14. Berglundh T., et al. “Peri-implant diseases and conditions: Consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions”. Journal of Clinical Periodontology20 (2018): S286-S291.
  15. Chapple ILC., et al. “Periodontal health and gingival diseases and conditions on an intact and a reduced periodontium: Consensus report of workgroup 1 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions”. Journal of Clinical Periodontology20 (2018): S68-S77.
  16. Lang NP and Bartold PM. “Periodontal health”. Journal of Periodontology1 (2018): S9-S16.
  17. Fine DH., et al. “Classification and diagnosis of aggressive periodontitis”. Journal of Periodontology 89 (2018): S103-S119.
  18. Marini L., et al. “The staging and grading system in defining periodontitis cases: Consistency and accuracy amongst periodontal experts, general dentists and undergraduate students”. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 2 (2021): 205-215.
  19. Abrahamian L., et al. “Intra- and inter-examiner reliability in classifying periodontitis according to the 2018 classification of periodontal diseases”. Journal of Clinical Periodontology1 (2022): 1-10.
  20. Eke PI., et al. “Update on prevalence of periodontitis in adults in the United States: NHANES 2009 to 2012”. Journal of Periodontology5 (2015): 611-622.
  21. “American Academy of Periodontology Task Force on the Update to the 1999 Classification of Periodontal Diseases and Conditions”. Journal of Periodontology7 (2017): 835-838.
  22. Caton JG., et al. “A new classification scheme for periodontal and peri-implant diseases”. Journal of Clinical PeriodontologyS20 (2018): S1-8.
  23. Trombelli L., et al. “Plaque-induced gingivitis”. Journal of Clinical PeriodontologyS20 (2018): S44-67.
  24. Holmstrup P., et al. “Non‑plaque‑induced gingival diseases”. Journal of Clinical Periodontology S20 (2018): S28-43.
  25. Genco RJ and Borgnakke WS. “Risk factors for periodontal disease”. Periodontology 20001 (2013): 59-94.
  26. Jepsen S., et al. “Periodontal manifestations of systemic diseases”. Journal of PeriodontologyS1 (2018): S237-248.
  27. Winkler P., et al. “Assessment of periodontitis grade using interdental attachment loss”. Journal of Clinical Periodontology9 (2022): 854-861.
  28. Sanz M., et al. “Treatment of stage I-III periodontitis: EFP S3 guideline”. Journal of Clinical PeriodontologyS22 (2020): 4-60.
  29. Persson RE., et al. “Comparison between panoramic and intra‑oral radiographs”. Journal of Periodontology Research (2003).
  30. European Federation of Periodontology. What have we learned since 2018. EFP Publications Hub. (2025).

Citation

Citation: Vishnusripriya J., et al. “The Evolution of Periodontitis Diagnosis: Understanding the 2017 Grading Criteria". Acta Scientific Dental Sciences 9.11 (2025): 91-98.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2025 Vishnusripriya J., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.




Metrics

Acceptance rate30%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days
Impact Factor1.278

Indexed In





News and Events


Contact US









ff

© 2024 Acta Scientific, All rights reserved.