Acta Scientific Dental Sciences

Research Article Volume 9 Issue 11

The Efficacy of a Behavioral Management Technique in Reducing Anxiety and Pain in Adolescent Dental Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Christopher Gregoire, Daniel Rinchuse, Thomas Zullo, Jason Draper and John Burnheimer*

Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Seton Hill University, USA

*Corresponding Author: John Burnheimer, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Seton Hill University, USA.

Received: September 29, 2025; Published: October 24, 2025

Abstract

Objective: This randomized controlled trial investigated the effects of a modified behavioral management technique, a pre-procedural recorded patient video demonstration, on anxiety and pain in adolescents in the first five days following the initial placement of fixed orthodontic appliances.

Materials and Methods: A total of 116 subjects between the ages of 10-17 were enrolled in the study, with 88 completing the study. Subjects were randomly allocated to either a recorded typodont group (control) or a recorded patient video group (experimental). Patient perceptions of anxiety and pain were evaluated with the six-item short form of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and the visual analog scale (VAS). Primary outcome was the change in anxiety, while the secondary outcome was difference in pain.

Results: This study revealed that subjects in the recorded patient video group reported significantly lower levels of anxiety and pain compared to the recorded typodont group, particularly within the first 24 hours post-procedure (p < 0.001). Anxiety and pain and levels in both groups gradually decreased over the five-day follow-up period. No significant differences were found between genders for either anxiety or pain.

Conclusions: This study found that recorded patient video demonstrations significantly reduced physiological anxiety and pain in adolescents undergoing the initial placement of fixed orthodontic appliances compared to recorded typodont videos. The most pronounced reduction occurred within the first 24 hours, a critical period for patient comfort. Audiovisual tools like these can enhance the orthodontic experience by improving patient comfort and reducing anxiety.

Keywords: Behavior Management; Anxiety Management; Patient Education; Audiovisual Demonstration; Adolescents

References

  1. Kamin Vara. “Fear, Stress, and the Well Dental Office”. Northwest Dentistry2 (2006): 10-18.
  2. Srai JP., et al. “Assessment of the Effect of Combined Multimedia and Verbal Information vs. Verbal Information Alone on Anxiety Levels before Bond-up in Adolescent Orthodontic Patients: A Single-Center Randomized Controlled Trial”. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics4 (2013): 505-511.
  3. Tickle M., et al. “A Prospective Study of Dental Anxiety in a Cohort of Children Followed from 5 to 9 Years of Age”. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry4 (2009): 225-232.
  4. Nuttall NM., et al. “Children’s Dental Anxiety in the United Kingdom in 2003”. Journal of Dentistry11, 2008): 857-860.
  5. Enkling Norbert., et al. “Dental Anxiety in a Representative Sample of Residents of a Large German City”. Clinical Oral Investigations1 (2006): 84-91.
  6. Olteanu Cristian Doru., et al. “Pain Perception during Orthodontic Treatment with Fixed Appliances-A Systematic Review”. Applied Sciences13 (2022): 6389.
  7. Hussain SA., et al. “Effects of Exposure to Animated Videos of Dental Procedures on Patients’ Anxiety and Decision-Making”. Quarterly Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (2024).
  8. Farzanegan F., et al. “Pain Reduction after Initial Archwire Placement in Orthodontic Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial”. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics2 (2012): 169-173.
  9. Sergl HG., et al. “Pain and Discomfort during Orthodontic Treatment: Causative Factors and Effects on Compliance”. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics6 (1998): 684-691.
  10. Erdinc AM and B Dincer. “Perception of Pain during Orthodontic Treatment with Fixed Appliances”. European Journal of Orthodontics 26 (2004): 79-85.
  11. Polat O and AI Karaman. “Pain Control during Fixed Orthodontic Appliance Therapy”. Angle Orthodontist 75, 2005): 214-219.
  12. Li J., et al. “The Effect of Physical Interventions on Pain Control after Orthodontic Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis”. PLOS ONE2 (2024): e0297783.
  13. Bernhardt MK., et al. “The Effect of Preemptive and/or Postoperative Ibuprofen Therapy for Orthodontic Pain”. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 120 (2001): 20-27.
  14. Fernandes LM., et al. “Pain and Discomfort Experienced after Placement of a Conventional or a Superelastic NiTi Aligning Archwire: A Randomized Clinical Trial”. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics 59 (1998): 331-339.
  15. Jones M and C Chan. “The Pain and Discomfort Experienced during Orthodontic Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Two Initial Aligning Archwires”. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 102 (1992): 373-381.
  16. Scheurer PA., et al. “Perception of Pain as a Result of Orthodontic Treatment with Fixed Appliances”. European Journal of Orthodontics 18 (1996): 349-357.
  17. Sheard C and P Garrud. “Evaluation of Generic Patient Information: Effects on Health Outcomes, Knowledge and Satisfaction”. Patient Education and Counseling1 (2006): 43-47.
  18. Chatziandroni-Frey A., et al. “Briefing of Orthodontic Patients”. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics6 (2000): 387-397.
  19. Stephens R., et al. “Information-Seeking Behavior of Adolescent Orthodontic Patients”. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics3 (2013): 303-309.
  20. Moher D., et al. “CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trial”. BMJ 340 (2010): 849.
  21. Marteau TM and H Bekker. “The Development of a Six-Item Short-Form of the State Scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)”. British Journal of Clinical Psychology3 (1992): 301-306.
  22. Broglio K. “Randomization in Clinical Trials: Permuted Blocks and Stratification”. JAMA21 (2018): 2223-2224.
  23. Ranganathan P., et al. “Common Pitfalls in Statistical Analysis: Intention-to-Treat versus Per-Protocol Analysis”. Perspectives in Clinical Research3 (2016): 144-146.
  24. Pandis N. “Randomization. Part 1: Sequence Generation”. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 140 (2011): 747-748.
  25. Pandis N. “Randomization. Part 2: Minimization”. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 140 (2011): 902-904.
  26. Al-Khotani A., et al. “Effects of Audiovisual Distraction on Children’s Behaviour and Anxiety during Dental Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial”. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica6 (2016): 494-501.
  27. Al-Namankany A., et al. “Video Modelling and Reducing Anxiety Related to Dental Injections in Children”. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry4 (2015): 277-282.
  28. Hine JF., et al. “Decreasing Disruptive Behaviour during Routine Dental Visits through Video Modelling”. Journal of Dentistry 86 (2019): 103-110.
  29. Phaneendra NS., et al. “The Effect of Video-Based Preanaesthetic Preparation versus Conventional Approach on Parental Anxiety in Paediatric Dental Procedures”. Cureus6 (2022): e25867.
  30. Park JH., et al. “Adolescents’ Compliance with Oral Hygiene Instructions during Orthodontic Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial”. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics3 (2017): 455-462.
  31. Klassen JA., et al. “Educational Interventions for Children Undergoing Procedures: A Systematic Review”. Pediatrics2 (2008): e273-e277.

Citation

Citation: John Burnheimer., et al. “The Efficacy of a Behavioral Management Technique in Reducing Anxiety and Pain in Adolescent Dental Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial".Acta Scientific Dental Sciences 9.11 (2025): 45-55.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2025 John Burnheimer., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.




Metrics

Acceptance rate30%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days
Impact Factor1.278

Indexed In





News and Events


Contact US









ff

© 2024 Acta Scientific, All rights reserved.