Chauhan Jyoti¹*, de Ataide Ida² and Fernandes Marina³

¹Post-Graduate Student, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Goa Dental College and Hospital, Bambolim, Goa, India
²Professor and HOD, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Goa Dental College and Hospital, Bambolim, Goa, India
³Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Goa Dental College and Hospital, bambolim, Goa, India

*Corresponding Author: Chauhan Jyoti, Post-Graduate Student, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Goa Dental College and Hospital, Bambolim, Goa, India.

Received: January 27, 2022; Published: April 07, 2022

Abstract

It is known that clinical success or failure of composite restorations rely to great extent on the quality and performance of the bonding system used juncture of teeth and restoration. Considering the current review, this paper focuses on enhancing knowledge regarding the concept of adhesion as well as ways of resin-dentin bond deterioration, while also enlisting the recent existing projections to overcome the challenges of dentin bonding.

Keywords: Strategies; Adhesive; Phosphoric; Acid

References

1. Van Meerbeek B., et al. “State of the art of self-etch adhesives”. Dental Materials1 (2011): 17-28.
2. Yoshida Y and Inoue S. “Chemical analyses in dental adhesive technology”. Japanese Dental Science Review2 (2012): 141-152.
3. Gwinnett AJ. “Moist versus dry dentin: its effect on shear bond strength”. American Journal of Dentistry 5 (1992): 127-129.
4. Kanca 3^rd “Effect of resin primer solvents and surface wetness on resin composite bond strength to dentin”. American Journal of Dentistry 5 (1992): 213-215.
5. Kanca 3^rd “Improving bond strength through acid etching of dentin and bonding to wet dentin surfaces”. Journal of the American Dental Association 123 (1992): 35-43.
6. Kanca 3^rd “Resin bonding to wet substrate. II. Bonding to enamel”. Quintessence International 23 (1992): 625-627.
7. Tay FR., et al. “The overwet phenomenon: a transmission electron microscopic study of surface moisture in the acid-conditioned, resin-dentin interface”. American Journal of Dentistry 9 (1996): 161-166.
8. Peumans M., et al. “Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials”. Dental Materials 21 (2005): 864-881.
9. Peumans M., et al. “Eight-year clinical evalution of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel etching”. Dental Materials 26 (2010): 1176-1184.
10. Perdigao J., et al. “Total-etch versus self-etch adhesive: effect on postoperative sensitivity”. Journal of the American Dental Association 134 (2003): 1621-1629.
11. Van Landuyt KL., et al. “Are one-step adhesives easier to use and better performing? Multifactorial assessment of contemporary one-step self-etching adhesives”. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 11 (2009): 175-190.
12. Suppa P., et al. “Nanoleakage within the hybrid layer: a correlative FEISEM/TEM investigation”. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B: Applied Biomaterials 73 (2005): 7-14.
13. Van Landuyt KL., et al. “Origin of interfacial droplets with one-step adhesives”. Journal of Dental Research 86 (2007): 739-744.
14. Van Landuyt K., et al. “Monomer-solvent phase separation in one-step self-etch adhesives”. Journal of Dental Research 84 (2005): 183-188.
15. Moszner N., et al. “Chemical aspects of self-etching enamel-dentin adhesives: a systematic review”. Dental Materials 21 (2005): 895-910.
16. Nishitani Y., et al. “Effects of resin hydrophilicity on dentin bond strength”. Journal of Dental Research 85 (2009): 1016-1021.
17. Pashley DH., et al. “From dry bonding to water-wet bonding to ethanol-wet bonding. A review of the interactions between dentin matrix and solvated resins using a macromodel of the hybrid layer”. American Journal of Dentistry 20 (2007): 7-20.
18. Tay FR and Pashley DH. “Have dentin adhesives become too hydrophilic?” Journal of the Canadian Dental Association 69 (2003): 726-731.
19. Sadek FT., et al. “Ethanol wet-bonding challenges current anti-degradation strategy”. Journal of Dental Research12 (2010): 1499-1504.
20. Miles CA and Burjanadze TV. “Thermal stability of collagen fibers in ethylene glycol”. Biophysical Journal 80 (2001): 1480-1486.
21. Cadenaro M., et al. “Influence of different initiators on the degree of conversion of experimental adhesive blends in relation to their hydrophilicity and solvent content”. Dental Materials4 (2010): 288-294.
22. Takahashi A., et al. “In vivo long-term durability of the bond to dentin using two adhesive systems”. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 4 (2002): 151-159.
23. Ye Q., et al. “Nanoscale Patterning in Crosslinked Methacrylate Copolymer Networks: An Atomic Force Microscopy Study”. The Journal of Applied Polymer Science Symptoms 106 (2007): 3843-3851.
24. Ferracane JL. “Elution of leachable components from composites”. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation4 (1994): 441-452.
25. Neumann MG., et al. “Molar extinction coefficients and the photon absorption efficiency of dental photoinitiators and light curing units”. Journal of Dentistry 33 (2005): 525-532.
26. Neumann MG., et al. “Molar extinction coefficients and the photon absorption efficiency of dental photoinitiators and light curing units”. Journal of Dentistry 33 (2005): 525-532.
27. Inoue S., et al. “Hydrolytic stability of self-etch adhesives bonded to dentin”. Journal of Dental Research 84 (2005): 1160-1164.
28. Fukegawa D., et al. “Chemical interaction of hydrogen phosphate ester with hydroxyapatite”. Journal of Dental Research 85 (2006): 941-944.
29. Yoshida Y., et al. “Adhesion to and decalcification of hydroxyapatite by carboxylic acids”. Journal of Dental Research 80 (2001): 1565-1569.
30. Yoshioka M., et al. “Adhesion/decalcification mechanisms of acid interactions with human hard tissues”. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 1 (2002): 56-62.
31. Stupp SI and Braun PV. “Molecular manipulation of microstructures: biomaterials, ceramics, and semiconductors”. Science 277 (1997): 1242-1248.
32. Gandhi DD., et al. “Annealing-induced interfacial toughening using a molecular nanolayer”. Nature 447 (2007): 299-302.
33. Yoshihara K., et al. “Nano-controlled molecular interaction at adhesive interfaces for hard tissue reconstruction”. Acta Biomateralia 6 (2010): 3573-3582.
34. Yoshihara K., et al. “Nano-layering of phosphoric-acid ester monomer at enamel and dentin”. Acta Biomaterialia 7 (2011a): 3187-3195.
35. Koshiro K., et al. “New concept of resin-dentin interfacial adhesion: the nanointeraction zone”. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials 77 (2006): 401-408.
36. Breschi L., et al. “Dental adhesion review: aging and stability of the bonded interface”. Dental Materials 24 (2008): 90-101.
37. Yoshida Y., et al. “Self-assembled nano-layering at the adhesive interface". Journal of Dental Research4 (2012): 376-381.
38. Elliott JC. “Calcium phosphate biominerals”. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry 48 (2002): 427-453.
39. Tsuchiya S., et al. “Ultrastructure of the dentin-adhesive interface after acid-base challenge”. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 6 (2004): 183-190.
40. Inoue G., et al. “Morphological and mechanical characterization of the acid-base resistant zone at the adhesive-dentin interface of intact and caries-affected dentin”. Operative Dentistry 31 (2006): 466-472.
41. Waidyasekera K., et al. “Reinforcement of dentin in self-etch adhesive technology: a new concept”. Journal of Dentistry 37 (2009): 604-609.
42. Nurrohman H., et al. “Hydroxyapatite crystal protection against acid-attack beneath resin-dentin interface with four adhesives: TEM and crystallography evidence”. Dental Materials 28 (2012): e89-e98.
43. Giannini M., et al. “Self-Etch adhesive systems: A literature review”. Brazilian Dental Journal1 (2015): 3-10.
44. Pashley DH., et al. “State of the art etch-and-rinse adhesives”. Dental Materials 27 (2011): 1-16.
45. Pashley DH., et al. “Effects of water and water-free polar solvents on the tensile properties of demineralized dentin”. Dental Materials 19 (1993): 347-352.
46. Tami AE., et al. “Probing the tissue to subcellular level structure underlying bone's molecular sieving function”. Biorheology 40 (2003): 577-590.
47. Sui Mai., et al. “Extrafibrillar collagen demineralization-based chelate-and-rinse technique bridges the gap between wet and dry dentin bonding”. Acta Biomaterialia 57 (2017): 435-448.
48. Chiba A., et al. “The effects of ethanol on the sizeexclusion characteristics of type I dentin collagen to adhesive resin monomers”. Acta Biomaterialia 33 (2016): 235-241.

Citation

Citation: Chauhan Jyoti., et al. “Modern Adhesive Strategies: A Review of Literature". Acta Scientific Dental Sciences 6.5 (2022): 24-30.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2022 Chauhan Jyoti., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.