Acta Scientific Dental Sciences (ISSN: 2581-4893)

Research ArticleVolume 5 Issue 6

Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Resistance of Root Dentine of Two MTA based Sealers and a Resin Sealer - An In Vitro Study

Meenu G Singla1* and Usha Tanwar2

1Professor, Department of Conservative and Endodontics, SRCDSR, Faridabad, Haryana, India
2Private Practitioner, India

*Corresponding Author: Meenu G Singla, Professor, Department of Conservative and Endodontics, SRCDSR, Faridabad, Haryana, India.

Received: April 05, 2021; Published: : May 05, 2021

Citation: Meenu G Singla and Usha Tanwar. “Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Resistance of Root Dentine of Two MTA based Sealers and a Resin Sealer - An In Vitro Study". Acta Scientific Dental Sciences 5.6 (2021): 21-26.

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate and compare the ability of two MTA based sealers: MTA Plus and EndoSeal MTA and an epoxy resin based sealer: AH Plus, to enhance the fracture resistance of root canal treated teeth.

Materials and Methods: Sixty-five single rooted mandibular premolars were decoronated at cementoenamel junction and were randomly divided into five groups: two control (n = 10) and three experimental (n = 15). Biomechanical preparation of root canals was done using Hero Shaper rotary files along with 3% sodium hypochlorite irrigation. Obturation was done using gutta percha with different sealers according to the groups- AH plus (group 3), EndoSeal MTA (group 4) and MTA Plus (group 5). Fracture resistance of the roots was evaluated using a Universal Testing Machine (UTM) under vertical loading.

Statistical Analysis: Inter-group comparison was done using One way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Post-hoc bonferroni test.

Results: Among the three experimental groups, highest fracture resistance was shown by group 3 followed by group 4 then group 5. There was no statistically significant difference between group 3 and negative control group. Group 5 was not statistically significant than the positive control group.

Conclusion: EndoSeal MTA has the potential to reinforce root canal treated teeth and it was comparable to AH Plus.

 

Keywords: AH Plus; EndoSeal MTA; Fracture Resistance; MTA Plus; Obturation

Bibliography

  1. Ersev H., et al. “Resistance of vertical root fracture of endodontically treated teeth with MetaSEAL”. Journal of Endodontics 38 (2012): 653-656.
  2. Lerticheirakaran V., et al. “Effects of root canal sealers on vertical root fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth”. Journal of Endodontics 3 (2002): 217-219.
  3. Mittal A., et al. “Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth with epoxy resin based sealer AH Plus and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate Fillapex: An in vitro study”. Indian Journal of Dental Sciences 9 (2017): 8-11.
  4. Upadhyay, ST., et al. “Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth obturated with Pozzolan-based MTA sealer and epoxy resin-based sealer: An in vitro study”. World Journal of Dentistry 1 (2017): 37-40.
  5. Lee JK., et al. “Physicochemical properties of epoxy resin- based and bioceramic-based root canal sealers”. Bioinorganic Chemistry and Applications 2017 (2017): 2582849.
  6. Forough Reyhani M., et al. “Push-Out Bond Strength of Dorifill, Epiphany and MTA-Fillapex Sealers to Root Canal Dentin with and without Smear Layer”. The Iranian Endodontic Journal 4 (2014): 246-250.
  7. Rawtiya M., et al. “MTA-based root canal sealers”. Journal of Orofacial Research 3 (2013): 16-21.
  8. Viapiana R., et al. “Porosity and sealing ability of root fillings with gutta-percha and BioRoot RCS or AH Plus sealers. Evaluation by three ex vivo methods”. International Endodontic Journal 49 (2016): 774-82.
  9. Yoo YJ., et al. “Dynamic intratubular biomineralization following root canal obturation with pozzolan-based mineral trioxide aggregate sealer cement”. Scanning 38 (2016): 50-56.
  10. Assmann E., et al. “Dentin bond strength of two mineral trioxide aggregate-based and one epoxy resin-based sealers”. Journal of Endodontics 38 (2012): 219-221.
  11. Mandava J., et al. “Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of root dentin to resin sealers and a MTA sealer: An in vitro study”. Journal of Conservative Dentistry 17 (2014): 53-56.
  12. Sagsen B., et al. “Push-out bond strength of two new calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers to root canal dentine”. International Endodontic Journal 44 (2011): 1088-1091.
  13. Saraswathi DD., et al. “A comparative evaluation of sealing ability of three recent root-end filling materials: an in vitro study”. Journal of Advanced Oral Research 2 (2015): 33-39.
  14. Gandolfi MG., et al. “Ion Release, Porosity, Solubility and Bioactivity of MTA Plus Tricalcium Silicate”. Journal of Endodontics (2014): 1-6.
  15. Silva EJ., et al. “Push- out bond strength of injectable pozzolan-based root canal sealer”. Journal of Endodontics 11 (2016): 1656-1659.
  16. Chadha R., et al. “An in vitro comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth obturated with different materials”. Contemporary Clinical Dentistry 2 (2010): 0-2.
  17. Kala MA., et al. “Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Obturated with AH Plus with GuttaPercha, Guttaflow with GuttaPercha and Resilon Epiphany- An In vitro Study”. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS) 13 (2021): 54-58.
  18. Chaudhari S., et al. “A comparative evaluation of resistance to vertical root fracture of enodontical treated teeth with recentl used sealers: An in vitro study”. Mharaja Krishnamarsinji Bhavnagar University2 (2015): 43-50.
  19. Onnink PA., et al. “An in itro comparison of incomplete root fractures associated with three obturation techniques”. Journal of Endodontics 1 (1994): 32-37.
  20. Ribeiro FC., et al. “Influence of different endodontic filling materials on root fracture susceptibility”. Journal of Dentistry 36 (2008): 69-73.
  21. Saw LH and Messer HH. “Root strains associated with different obturation techniques”. Journal of Endodontics 6 (1995): 314-320.
  22. Soros C., et al. “Spreader load required for vertical root fracture during lateral compaction e vivo: evaluation of periodontal stimulation and fracture load information”. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, and Oral Radiology 2 (2000): 64-70.
  23. Kim M., et al. “Microleakage assessment of a pozzolan cement-based mineral trioide aggregate root canal sealer”. Journal of The Korean Academy of Pediatric Dentistry: JKAPD 1 (2017): 20-26.
  24. Lim ES., et al. “Physical properties and biocompatibility of an injectable calcium-silicate based root canal sealer: in vitro and in vivo study”. BMC Oral Health 15 (2015): 129.
  25. Formosa LM., et al. “Push-out bond strength of MTA with antiwashout gel or resins”. International Endodontic Journal 47 (2014): 454-462.
  26. P Neelakantan., et al. “The effect of root dentin conditioning protocols on the push-out bond strength of three calcium-silicate sealers”. The International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives 60 (2015): 104-108.

Copyright: © 2021 Meenu G Singla and Usha Tanwar. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.



News and Events


  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.
  • Submission Timeline for Upcoming Issue
    The last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is June 25, 2021.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of “Best Article of the Issue”.
  • Welcoming Article Submission
    Acta Scientific delightfully welcomes active researchers for submission of articles towards the upcoming issue of respective journals.
  • Contact US