Acta Scientific Clinical Case Reports (ASCR)

Research Article Volume 6 Issue 10

Comparative Evaluation of BISAP, Haps, Ranson's, and PANC3 Scoring Systems for Predicting Severity in Acute Pancreatitis: A 5-Year Prospective Study

Anand Bhandary Panambur1* and Ashok Hegde2

1Assistant Professor, Department of General Surgery, A J Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, NH 66, Kuntikana, Mangalore 575004, Karnataka, India
2Professor, Department of General Surgery, A J Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, NH 66, Kuntikana, Mangalore 575004, Karnataka, India

*Corresponding Author: Anand Bhandary Panambur, Assistant Professor of Surgery, Consultant Laparoscopic and General Surgeon, A J Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, NH 66, Kuntikana, Mangalore 575004, Karnataka, India.

Received: September 29, 2025; Published: October 21, 2025

Abstract

In evaluating the severity of acute pancreatitis over a five-year period with 310 cases, this prospective study evaluates the clinical value and predicted accuracy of four scoring systems: BISAP, HAPS, Ranson's, and PANC3. Analysis was done on sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, area under the curve (AUC), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and specificity. HAPS had the highest PPV (95.1%), whereas BISAP and PANC3 had superior discrimination (AUC 0.82 and 0.883) and greater sensitivity (90.9% and 100%). Ranson's demonstrated superior sensitivity (100%) but poorer PPV (21%), and specificity (56%). According to our research, HAPS and Ranson's offer supplementary clinical insights, while BISAP and PANC3 are effective for early bedside severity prediction. The application of these metrics can enhance clinical results and enable prompt action.

Keywords: Acute Pancreatitis (AP); Prospective Study; BISAP Score; HAPS; Ranson’s Score; PANC3; Positive Predictive Value (PPV); Negative Predictive Value (NPV); Bedside Scoring Systems; Risk Stratification; Revised Atlanta Classification

References

  1. Atlanta classification severity categories Banks PA., et al. “Classification of acute pancreatitis—2012: Revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus”. Gut1 (2013): 102-111.
  2. Dixit S., et al. “Clinical prognostic scores in acute pancreatitis: APACHE II, Ranson, Glasgow and BISAP scores”. Hindawi (2018).
  3. Singh VK., et al. “A review of the Harmless Acute Pancreatitis Score (HAPS)”. World Journal of Gastroenterology (2019).
  4. Wu BU., et al. “The BISAP score is comparable to APACHE II and Ranson’s score in predicting severity and mortality in acute pancreatitis”. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (2019).
  5. Brown A., et al. “Post-test likelihood of severe acute pancreatitis predicted by PANC3 score”. Pancreatology (2016).
  6. Yadav D., et al. “Obesity and acute pancreatitis: risk and impact on outcomes”. Pancreas (2016).
  7. Brown A., et al. “Hemoconcentration as a marker for severe pancreatitis”. Pancreatology (2017).
  8. Prasad DK., et al. “Etiology and epidemiology of acute pancreatitis in India”. Indian Journal of Gastroenterology (2019).
  9. Lankisch PG., et al. “The BISAP score predicts mortality and severity in acute pancreatitis”. Pancreas (2015).
  10. Agarwal N., et al. “Clinical utility and limitations of Ranson’s score in acute pancreatitis”. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology (2018).
  11. Chen CC., et al. “Early predictors of severity in acute pancreatitis: Comparison of scoring systems”. Journal of the Chinese Medical Association (2020).
  12. Papachristou GI., et al. “Use of severity scores to improve outcomes in pancreatitis”. World Journal of Gastroenterology (2017).
  13. Bollen TL. Blood markers in pancreatitis severity: limitations and standards”. Radiographics (2015).
  14. Mortele KJ., et al. “The CTSI score for acute pancreatitis”. Investigative Radiology (2017).
  15. Papachristou GI., et al. “Harmless Acute Pancreatitis Score validation study”. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (2016).
  16. Brown A., et al. “Validation of PANC3 score in acute pancreatitis”. Pancreatology (2018).
  17. Negi S., et al. “Alcohol-related acute pancreatitis epidemiology in India”. Pancreas (2017).
  18. Panda P., et al. “Gallstone pancreatitis clinical profile”. Indian Journal of Surgery (2021).
  19. Marshall JC., et al. “Multiple organ dysfunction scoring”. Critical Care Medicine (2015).
  20. Hansen MB., et al. “Statistical approaches in pancreatitis severity prediction studies”. Clinical Epidemiology (2019).

Citation

Citation: Anand Bhandary Panambur and Ashok Hegde. “Comparative Evaluation of BISAP, Haps, Ranson's, and PANC3 Scoring Systems for Predicting Severity in Acute Pancreatitis: A 5-Year Prospective Study". Acta Scientific Clinical Case Reports 6.10 (2025): 08-13.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2025 Anand Bhandary Panambur and Ashok Hegde. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.




Metrics

Acceptance rate35%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days

Indexed In