Constance Nyaruwata*

Ministry of Lands, Agriculture, Fisheries, Water and Rural Development, Department of Agricultural Education, Zimbabwe Agricultural College, Zimbabwe

*Corresponding Author: Constance Nyaruwata, Ministry of Lands, Agriculture, Fisheries, Water and Rural Development, Department of Agricultural Education, Zimbabwe Agricultural College, Zimbabwe.

Received: April 01, 2025; Published: April 21, 2025

Abstract

This review critically examines the sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) production and marketing landscape in Zimbabwe over a ten-year period (2013-2023), with a particular focus on smallholder farmer participation, value chain efficiency, and institutional bottlenecks. Using quantitative secondary data, the study analysed trends in yields, area under cultivation, district-level production disparities, and market dynamics. Results reveal persistent underperformance in productivity, with average yields of 700 kg/ha significantly below regional benchmarks. Constraints such as limited access to certified seed, high post-harvest losses averaging 17%, inadequate processing infrastructure, and weak market access dominate the production environment. Geographical analysis showed sesame's concentration in agro-ecological zones IV and V, where favourable climatic conditions are undermined by poor infrastructure and limited extension services. The marketing component is typified by middlemen dominance, price volatility, and informal cross-border trade, particularly with Mozambique and Zambia. Comparative regional analysis with Ethiopia, Uganda, and Nigeria underscores the pivotal role of farmer cooperatives, targeted policy interventions, and public-private partnerships in improving productivity and commercialisation. The study recommends eight strategic actions, including the establishment of a national sesame board, expansion of contract farming, investment in rural processing clusters, digital market systems, and integration into export policy frameworks. The paper concludes that sesame has significant potential to contribute to rural livelihoods and national economic diversification if supported by coordinated institutional reforms and market-oriented strategies. These findings offer critical insights for policymakers, development partners, and agribusiness actors seeking to revitalise Zimbabwe’s sesame sector

Keywords: Sesame Production; Value Chain; Smallholder Farmers; Marketing Constraints; Institutional Reform; Zimbabwe

References

1. Myint D., et al. “Sustainable sesame (Sesamum indicum) production through improved technology: An overview of production, challenges, and opportunities in Myanmar”. Sustainability 12.9 (2020): 3515.
2. Dossa KF., et al. “Economic analysis of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) production in Northern Benin”. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 6 (2023): 1015122.
3. Teklu DH., et al. “Genetic improvement in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.): Progress and outlook: A review”. Agronomy9 (2022): 2144.
4. Wacal C., et al. “Analysis of sesame seed production and export trends; challenges and strategies towards increasing production in Uganda”. Agriculture and Food Security1 (2021): 56.
5. Katanga YN., et al. “Socio-Economic Analysis of Sesame Marketing in Hadejia LGA of Jigawa State, Nigeria”. Ife Journal of Agriculture1 (2021): 36-45.
6. Sipeyiye M., et al. “Gendered small-scale crops and power dynamics: A case of uninga (sesame) production amongst the Ndau of south-eastern Zimbabwe”. HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies2 (2021).
7. Singh A., et al. “Constraints on sesame and mustard of production and marketing by using Garrett ranking”. The Pharma Innovation Journal 7 (2022): 585-588.
8. Sanni GB., et al. “Production and Achievements in Sesamum indicum Industry in the world: past and current state”. Oil Crop Science (2024).
9. Usman M., et al. “Factors affecting postharvest losses of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) and their mitigation strategies”. Agronomy10 (2022): 2470.
10. Sirany T and Tadele E. “Economics of sesame and its use dynamics in Ethiopia”. The Scientific World Journal 1 (2022): 1263079.
11. Zhang A and Liang H. “A New Method for Quantitative Evaluation of Perforation Damage in Sandstone Targets”. In Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering (2024): 198-211.
12. Rahman A., et al. “The prospect of developing sesame industry in Northern Australia through analysing market opportunity”. Australasian Journal of Regional Studies3 (2020): 347-378.
13. Lukurugu GA., et al. “Sesame production constraints, variety traits preference in the Southeastern Tanzania: Implication for genetic improvement”. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research 14 (2023): 100665.
14. Anyogu A., et al. “Food safety issues associated with sesame seed value chains: Current status and future perspectives”. Heliyon (2024).
15. Bedasa Y and Gebissa B. “Review on economic efficiency of smallholders farmers in the production of sesame: The Case of Ethiopia”. Journal of Investment and Management 4 (2020): 107-114.
16. Boru M. “Sesame (Sesamum indicum) research and production status in Ethiopia: A comprehensive review”. Ecology and Evolutionary Biology 6.2 (2021): 38-41.
17. Meissel K and Brown GTL. “Quantitative Research Methods”. Research Gate (2023).
18. Barella Y., et al. “Quantitative Methods in Scientific Research”. Terbitan Berkala Ilmiah Sociologique1 (2024): 281.
19. Wallwey C and Kajfez RL. “Quantitative research artifacts as qualitative data collection techniques in a mixed methods research study”. Methods in Psychology 8 (2023): 100115.
20. Kamolov S and Tarazevich M. “Quantitative methods for executive public managers”. E3S Web of Conferences 403 (2023): 08002.
21. Thelwall M. “Quantitative Methods in Research Evaluation Citation Indicators, Altmetrics, and Artificial Intelligence”. arXiv (Cornell University) (2024).
22. Sun H and Ye J. “Research on Quantitative Assessment Method for Fire Spread Risk in Enclosed Buildings”. Fire Technology (2024).
23. Munther M., et al. “Quantitative Research Methods: Maximizing Benefits, Addressing Limitations, and Advancing Methodological”. ResearchGate (2024).
24. Sardana N., et al. “Qualitative and quantitative research methods”. In Elsevier eBooks (2023): 65-69.
25. Crow G. “Quantitative and Qualitative Methods. In Emerald Publishing Limited eBooks (2024): 65-86.
26. Brahimi MA and Leperlier T. “Quantitative Methods in Intellectual History”. In Routledge eBooks (2023): 100-115.
27. Kawar LN., et al. “Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, and Triangulation Research Simplified”. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing (2024): 1-7.
28. Nowlin MC and Wehde W. “Teaching quantitative methods to students of public policy. In Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks (2024): 168-180.
29. Kusse K., et al. “A Value Chain Analysis of Sesame (Sesame indicum) in South Omo Zone, Southern Ethiopia”. Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce 16.1 (2022).
30. Yadav R., et al. “Current research trends and prospects for yield and quality improvement in sesame, an important oilseed crop”. Frontiers in Plant Science 13 (2022): 863521.

Citation

Citation: Constance Nyaruwata. “A Review of Sesame Production and Marketing in Zimbabwe". Acta Scientific Agriculture 9.5 (2025): 16-33.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2025 Constance Nyaruwata. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.