Acta Scientific Agriculture (ASAG)(ISSN: 2581-365X)

Review Article Volume 6 Issue 9

Biorational Approach: An Alternative Approach to Control the Wilt Diseases of Crops

Ritwik Sahoo*

MSc, Student, Department of Plant Pathology, Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour, Bhagalpur, Bihar, India

*Corresponding Author: Ritwik Sahoo, MSc, Student, Department of Plant Pathology, Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour, Bhagalpur, Bihar, India.

Received: June 17, 2022; Published: August 30, 2022


Wilt diseases are one of the most severe diseases which vigorously cause losses in various crops like-tomato, brinjal etc. Wilt disease is caused by fungi, bacteria and virus also and can be induced by nematode also. Therefore, wilt disease is a major problem in all over the world. The severity of fusarium wilt in brinjal is 10%-90% [27,36] and for bacterial wilt fruit yield is reduced by 20%-30% [5] in brinjal Although chemicals are broadly used to control these wilt diseases, but because of growing concerns about health and environmental safety, the use of toxic, carcinogenic, and/or environmentally damaging chemicals are being discouraged. These chemicals leave toxic residues in consumable agricultural commodities. The survey of monitoring of farm-gate samples in different parts of the country recorded pesticide residues above Maximum Residue Limit (MRL) [19,23]. So, novel strategies including biorational approaches against these wilt diseases are needed for their sustainable management. Antagonistic microorganisms, such as fungi and probiotic bacteria from diverse taxonomic genera were found to suppress wilt diseases both in vitro and in vivo. Various classes of secondary metabolites, such as alkaloids, phenolics, and terpenoids of plant and microbial origin and various plant origin substances significantly inhibit the causal organisms and are also effective in managing the wilt diseases. Besides these organic amendments are also helpful to control these wilt diseases as they are commonly soil borne in nature. Common mode of action of biocontrol agents include-induced resistance, mycoparasitism, antibiosis, antibiotic production, induced systemic resistance and competition. Mechanism of organic amendments include-modification of physico- chemical environment of soil in host favour, pathogen eradication by direct antagonism and decomposition products and microbial metabolites effects. Mode of action of botanicals include-reaction with various enzymes and complex materials in cell wall or membrane. There is proof of control of bacterial wilt by Pseudomonas sp. [11] as well green manure derived from medicinal plant [18] and Cinnamon oil [22]. Therefore, these biorational approaches will become very helpful if we use them more commercially than chemicals, this review updates our knowledge in this perspective.

Keywords: Wilt; Biorational; Induced Resistance; Mycoparasitism; Antibiosis; Induced Systemic Resistance


  1. Akanmu AO., et al. “Plant disease management: leveraging on the plant-microbe-soil interface in the biorational use of organic amendments”. Frontiers in Plant Science (2021): 1590.
  2. Aldinary AM., et al. “Biocontrol of tomato Fusarium wilt disease by a new Moringa endophytic Aspergillus isolate”. Materials Today: Proceedings (2021).
  3. Anitha A and Rabeeth M. “Control of Fusarium wilt of tomato by bioformulation of Streptomyces griseus in green house condition”. African Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 1 (2009): 9-14.
  4. Arora K., et al. “Non-edible oil cakes as a novel substrate for DPA production and augmenting biocontrol activity of Paecilomyces variotii”. Frontiers in Microbiology 8 (2017): 753.
  5. Begum HA. “Studies on the Integrated Management for Tomato Wilt Complex”. PhD Thesis, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh (2007).
  6. Beneduzi A., et al. “Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): their potential as antagonists and biocontrol agents”. Genetics and Molecular Biology4 (2012): 1044-1051.
  7. Bonanomi G., et al. “Organic amendments modulate soil microbiota and reduce virus disease incidence in the TSWV-tomato pathosystem”. Pathogens5 (20200): 379.
  8. Bowers JH and Locke JC. “Effect of botanical extracts on the population density of Fusarium oxysporum in soil and control of Fusarium wilt in the greenhouse”. Plant Disease3 (2000): 300-305.
  9. Cooley DR. “Biorational approaches to disease management in apples”. Biorational Tree-Fruit Pest Management (2009): 214.
  10. El Kichaoui A., et al. “Development of beauveria bassiana-based bio-fungicide against Fusarium Wilt pathogens for Capsicum Annuum, a Promising approach toward vital biocontrol industry in Gaza Strip”. IUG Journal of Natural Studies (2017).
  11. Frey P., et al. “Hrp-mutants of Pseudomonas solanacearum as potential biocontrol agents of tomato bacterial wilt”. Applied and Environmental Microbiology9 (1994): 3175-3181.
  12. Gerbore J., et al. “Biological control of plant pathogens: advantages and limitations seen through the case study of Pythium oligandrum”. Environmental Science and Pollution Research7 (2017): 4847-4860.
  13. Gupta SURUCHI and Sharma A. “Evaluation of plant yield, macro and micronutrients concentration in spinach (Spinacia oleracea) plant tissue as well as in soil amended with hair as fertilizer”. International Journal of Chemical Sciences 12.1 (2014): 73-82.
  14. Harman GE. “Myths and dogmas of biocontrol changes in perceptions derived from research on Trichoderma harzinum T-22”. Plant Disease4 (2000): 377-393.
  15. Heidarzadeh N and Baghaee-Ravari S. “Application of Bacillus pumilus as a potential biocontrol agent of Fusarium wilt of tomato”. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection13-16 (2015): 841-849.
  16. com, Disease Management (2012).
  17. Kandan A., et al. “Use of Pseudomonas fluorescens-based formulations for management of tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) and enhanced yield in tomato”. Biocontrol Science and Technology6 (2005): 553-569.
  18. Khan RAA., et al. “Management of Ralstonia solanacearum (Smith) Wilt in Tomato Using Green Manure of the Medicinal Plant Adhatoda vasica (L.) Nees”. Gesunde Pflanzen 72.2 (2020): 129-138.
  19. Kole RK., et al. “Monitoring of pesticide residues in farmgate vegetable samples in West Bengal”. Pesticide Research Journal 14 (2002): 77-82.
  20. Larkin RP and Fravel DR. “Efficacy of various fungal and bacterial biocontrol organisms for control of Fusarium wilt of tomato”. Plant Disease9 (1998): 1022-1028.
  21. Latz MA., et al. “Endophytic fungi as biocontrol agents: elucidating mechanisms in disease suppression”. Plant Ecology and Diversity5-6 (2018): 555-567.
  22. Lee YH., et al. “Chemical pesticides and plant essential oils for disease control of tomato bacterial wilt”. The Plant Pathology Journal 28 (2012): 32-39.
  23. Madan VK., et al. “Monitoring of pesticides from farmgate samples of vegetables in Haryana”. Pesticide Research Journal 8 (1996): 56-60.
  24. Malandraki I., et al. “Thermal inactivation of compost suppressiveness implicates possible biological factors in disease management”. Biological Control 2 (2008): 180-187.
  25. Martinez C., et al. “Salicylic acid and ethylene pathways are differentially activated in melon cotyledons by active or heat-denatured cellulase from Trichoderma longibrachiatum”. Plant Physiology1 (2001): 334-344.
  26. Müller H and Berg G. “Impact of formulation procedures on the effect of the biocontrol agent Serratia plymuthica HRO-C48 on Verticillium wilt in oilseed rape”. BioControl6 (2008): 905-916.
  27. Nishat S., et al. “Genetic Diversity of the Bacterial Wilt Pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum Using a RAPD Marker”. Comptes Rendus Biologies 338 (2015): 757-767.
  28. Pal KK and Gardener BM. “Biological control of plant pathogens (2006).
  29. Seethapathy P., et al. “Botanicals in eco-friendly post harvest disease management”. Innovative Farming3 (2016): 67-71.
  30. Shruthi CR., et al. “Bio-efficacy of bio-pesticides, botanicals and new molecules of insecticides against thrips on tomato (2012).
  31. Singh S., et al. “Current advancement and future prospect of biosorbents for bioremediation”. Science of the Total Environment 709 (2020):
  32. Srivastava R., et al. “Evaluation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus, fluorescent Pseudomonas and Trichoderma harzianum formulation against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici for the management of tomato wilt”. Biological Control1 (2010): 24-31.
  33. Srivastava R., et al. “Evaluation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus, fluorescent Pseudomonas and Trichoderma harzianum formulation against Fusarium oxysporum sp. lycopersici for the management of tomato wilt”. Biological Control 53.1 (2010): 24-31.
  34. Sundaramoorthy S and Balabaskar P. “Biocontrol efficacy of Trichoderma spp. against wilt of tomato caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. Lycopersici”Journal of Applied Biology and Biotechnology3 (2013): 0-4.
  35. Thambugala KM., et al. “Fungi vs. fungi in biocontrol: An overview of fungal antagonists applied against fungal plant pathogens”. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology 10 (2020): 604923.
  36. Vanitha SC., et al. “Bacterial Wilt of Tomato in Karnataka and Its Management by Pseudomonas fluorescens”. Biocontrol 54 (2009): 685-695.
  37. Vianene NM and Abawi GS. “Hirsutella rhossiliensisand Verticillium chlamydosporium as Biocontrol Agents of the Root-knot Nematode Meloidogyne hapla on Lettuce”. Journal of Nematology1 (2000): 85.
  38. Woo SL and Lorito M. “Exploiting the interactions between fungal antagonists, pathogens and the plant for biocontrol”. In Novel biotechnologies for biocontrol agent enhancement and management (2007): 107-130.
  39. Xue QY., et al. “Evaluation of the strains of Acinetobacter and Enterobacter as potential biocontrol agents against Ralstonia wilt of tomato”. Biological Control3 (2009): 252-258.
  40. Yogev A., et al. “Plant waste-based composts suppressive to diseases caused by pathogenic Fusarium oxysporum”European Journal of Plant Pathology4 (2006): 267-278.
  41. Yuan S., et al. “Biological control of tobacco bacterial wilt using Trichoderma harzianum amended bioorganic fertilizer and the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi Glomus mosseae”Biological Control 92 (2016): 164-171.
  42. Zheng X., et al. “A Streptomyces strain: isolation, identification, and potential as a biocontrol agent against soilborne diseases of tomato plants”. Biological Control 136 (2019): 104004.


Citation: Ritwik Sahoo. “Biorational Approach: An Alternative Approach to Control the Wilt Diseases of Crops". Acta Scientific Agriculture 6.9 (2022): 71-77.


Copyright: © 2022 Ritwik Sahoo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.


Acceptance rate32%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days
Impact Factor1.014

Indexed In

News and Events

  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.
  • Submission Timeline for Upcoming Issue
    The last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is May 30, 2024.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of "Best Article of the Issue"
  • Welcoming Article Submission
    Acta Scientific delightfully welcomes active researchers for submission of articles towards the upcoming issue of respective journals.

Contact US