Acta Scientific Agriculture (ASAG)(ISSN: 2581-365X)

Research Article Volume 4 Issue 4

Phenotypic Characterisation of Indigenous Chickens in Rushinga District

Tonderai Gombarume, Rumbidzai B Nhara*, Tinoziva Hungwe and Nyasha Sakadzo

Department of Livestock, Wildlife and Fisheries, Great Zimbabwe University, Zimbabwe

*Corresponding Author: Rumbidzai B Nhara, Department of Livestock, Wildlife and Fisheries, Garry Magadzire School of Agriculture, Great Zimbabwe University, Masvingo, Zimbabwe.

Received: February 25, 2020; Published: March 04, 2020



  Study sought to phenotypically characterise indigenous chickens in Rushinga district. Samples were drawn from three wards with the highest number of chickens. Purposive sampling was initially carried to select indigenous chicken farmers followed by snowball sampling to identify more farmers with at least ten adult chickens. A total of 65 questionnaires were administered randomly to assess on production environment. Data was analysed using SPSS version 16 for frequencies, descriptive statistics and multivariate analysis of variance to differentiate chicken populations in wards on quantitative traits. The study showed that more females (67.7%) where involved in indigenous chicken production compared to males (32.3%). Mean flock size was 23.07 and flock composition was mainly characterized by chicks, pullets and cockerels. Neck lengths, shank length, comb height, wattle length and wing span were significantly different amongst all wards (p < 0.05). Pelvic width; back length; body circumference, body weight and body length, were similar in all the wards investigated. Production environment in Rushinga is characterized by resource poor farmers who rely on erratic rain fed farming for income. Phenotypically, chickens exert adaptive characteristics to harsh climatic and production environment. There is need to design and implement a national research program to collect, conserve and improve indigenous chicken breeds.

Keywords: Indigenous Chickens; Production Environment; Phenotype



  1. Melesse A. “Significance of scavenging chicken production in the rural community of Africa for enhanced food security”. World's Poultry Science Journal 70.3 (2014): 593-606.
  2. Mtileni BJ., et al. “Genetic diversity and origin of South African chickens”. Poultry science 90.10 (2012): 2189-2194.
  3. Choprakarn K and Wongpichert K. “Village chicken production system in Thailand”. In: Thieme, O. and Pilling, D. (Ed), Poultry in the 21st Century: Avian influenza and beyond. Proceedings of the international Poultry Conference, Bangkok (2008).
  4. Melesse A and Negesse T. “Phenotypic and morphological characterization of indigenous chicken populations in southern region of Ethiopia”. Animal Generation Resources 49 (2014): 19-31. 
  5. Okeno TO., et al. “Characterization of indigenous chicken production systems in Kenya”. Tropical Animal. Health and Production 44 (2012): 601-608.
  6. FAO. Draft guidelines for molecular characterization of animal genetic resources for food and agriculture, Rome, Italy (2010).
  7. Smith DP., et al. “Meat quality and sensory attributes of a conventional and a label Rouge-type broiler strain obtained at retail”. Poultry Science 89 (2012): 1481-1489.
  8. Daikwo IS., et al. “Phenotypic characterization of local chickens in Dekina”. International Journal of Poultry Science 10 (2011): 444-447.
  9. Dessie T., et al. “Current state of Knowledge of Phenotypic Characteristics of Indigenous Chickens in the tropics”. Worlds Poultry Science Journal 67.3 (2011): 507-516.
  10. Hailu A. “Indigenous chicken production in Kenya: A review” 9.4 (2013): 309-316.
  11. Duguma R. “Understanding the role of indigenous chickens during the long walk to food security in Ethiopia”. Livestock Research for Rural Development 18.9 (2009): 131.
  12. FAO. “Phenotypic Characterization of animal genetic resources”. FAO Animal Production and Health Guidelines No.11. Rome, Italy (2012).
  13. EACS. “Promote agricultural investments: An opportunity to enhance food security in the East Africa countries”. EAC Geneva Forum (2014): 1-8.
  14. Moges F., et al. “Assessment of village chicken production system and evaluation of the productive and reproductive performance of local chicken ecotype in Bure district, North West Ethiopia”. African Journal of Agriculture Research 5 (2010): 1739-1748.
  15. Petrus NP. Characterization and Production Performance of Indigenous Chickens in Northern Namibia Regions, A PHD, Dissertation Submitted to the University of Namibia in Animal Science, Namibia (2011).
  16. Meseret M. “Characterization of village chicken production and marketing systems in Gomma Wereda, Jimma zone, Ethiopia”. M.Sc. Theisis, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia (2010).
  17. Mtileni BJ., et al. “Characterization of production systems for indigenous chicken genetic resources of South Africa”. Applied Animal Husbandry and Rural Development (2009).
  18. Dana N., et al. “Production objectives and trait preferences of village poultry producers of Ethiopia. Implications for designing breeding schemes utilizing Indigenous chicken genetic resources”. Tropical Animal Health and Production 42 (2010): 1519-1529
  19. Okeno TO., et al. “Characterization of indigenous chicken production systems in Kenya”. Tropical Animal Health and Production 44 (2012): 601-608.
  20. Mapiye C., et al. “A research review of village chicken production constraints and opportunities in Zimbabwe”. Asian-Australian Journal of Animal Science (2009).
  21. Asresie A and E Mitiku. “Traditional Chicken Production System and Marketing in Ethiopia: A review”. Journal of Marketing and Consumer Research 8 (2015): 2422-8451.
  22. Harrison J. “An assessment of chicken husbandry including Newcastle disease control in rural areas of Chibuto, Mozambique”. Journal of Tropical Animal Health and Production 42 (2010): 729-736.
  23. Mekonnem HD. “Assessment of the nutritional status of indigenous scavenging chicken s in Ada district, Ethiopia”. Tropical Animal Health and Production 42 (2010): 123-130.
  24. Sawai H., et al. The Origin and Genetic Variation of Domestic Chickens with special Reference to Junglefowls Gallus gallus and G varius (2010).
  25. Thieme O., et al. Defining family poultry production systems and their contribution to livelihoods. In: Decision tools for family poultry development, FAO Animal Production and Health Guidelines No 16. Rome, Italy (2014).
  26. Melesse A., et al. “Assessment of the prevailing handling and quality of eggs from scavenging indigenous chickens reared in different agro-ecological zones of Ethiopia”. Journal of Environmental and Occupational Science 2.10 (2013c): 1-8.
  27. Apuno AA., et al. “Characterization of local chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus) in Shelleng and Song Local Government Areas of Adamawa State, Nigeria”. Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America 2 (2011): 6-14.
  28. Egahi JO., et al. “Variations in qualitative traits in the Nigerian local chicken”. International Journal of Poultry Science 9.10 (2010): 978-979.
  29. Daikwo IS., et al. “Phenotypic characterization of local chickens in Dekina”. International Journal of Poultry Science 10 (2011): 444-447.
  30. Fish P., et al. “Poultry, Fisheries and Wildlife Sciences Indigenous Chicken Production system and Breeding Practice in North”. 1 (2013): 1-9.
  31. Guni FS and Kutule AM. “Characterization of local chickens in selected districts of the Southern highlands of Tanzania: Qualitative characters”. Livestock Research for Rural Development 25.153 (2013).
  32. Aklilu E., et al. “Phenotypic Characterization of Indigenous Chicken Population in Ethiopia”. International Journal of Interdisciplinary and Multidisciplinary Studies 1 (2013): 24-32.
  33. Ige OA., et al. “Qualitative Traits characterization of Yoruba and Fulani Ecotype Indigenous Chickens in Derived Savanna Zone of Nigeria”. International Journal Poultry Science 11 (2012): 616-620.


Citation: Rumbidzai B Nhara., et al. “Phenotypic Characterisation of Indigenous Chickens in Rushinga District". Acta Scientific Agriculture 4.4 (2020): 20-24.


Acceptance rate32%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days
Impact Factor1.014

Indexed In

News and Events

  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.
  • Submission Timeline for Upcoming Issue
    The last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is March 20, 2023.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of “Best Article of the Issue”.
  • Welcoming Article Submission
    Acta Scientific delightfully welcomes active researchers for submission of articles towards the upcoming issue of respective journals.
  • Contact US